Calculate Parallel Transport: Get Out of Logical Loop

snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
I'm in a logical loop here:

1. A tensor undergoes parallel transport if, as it moves through a manifold, its covariant derivative is zero.

2. Covariant derivative describes how a tensor changes as it moves through a manifold.

3. A tensor undergoes change as it moves if it does not parallel transport.

So how do I get out of this loop? I have an intuitive sense of parallel transport, but I do not know how to describe it mathematically except by using the definition above (1). Perhaps the answer lies in the calculus of variations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are potentially a lot of ways. One way is to define the abstract properties a covariant derivative must have (things like obeying the chain rule, for instance, though that's not sufficient, there are 4-5 conditions needed), then finding the particular derivative operator or operators that are metric compatible.

You can start with the idea of a connection, which is a linear map from a tangent space at point p to the nearby point q as well, and look for a special connection called the Leva-Civita connection that's metric compatible and torsion free.

One rather offbeat way is to use Schild's ladder to define parallel transport. You need to have a definition of a geodesic for this to work as you must construct and extend geodesic segments for this approach to work. It's an approximate geometric construction that transports a vector by constructing parallelograms, and stating that the sides of a parallelogram are parallel. See for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schild's_ladder&oldid=636833569

You'll find a description of Schild's ladder in MTW"s Gravitation as well, but the approach seems to be rather offbeat and not particularly popular in textbooks. You'd need to define geodesics other than curves that parallel transport themselves for it not to be circular, this is possible by using variational principles.
 
Thanks, pervect. This stuff goes deep!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top