Calculate temperature of a conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the temperature change of a conductor when it is halved and connected to an ideal battery. Initially, the conductor reaches a temperature of 24°C from 20°C, resulting in a temperature rise of 4°C. Upon halving the conductor, the participants conclude that the new temperature rise should be 8°C due to the doubling of power and the halving of the heat transfer area, leading to a final temperature of 36°C. Key equations discussed include the relationship between resistance, current, and temperature change, specifically using the formula ΔT = k(I²R).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical resistance and Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with thermal conductivity and heat transfer principles
  • Knowledge of power calculations in electrical circuits
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for integrating power equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of Newton's Law of Cooling and its application in thermal systems
  • Explore the relationship between electrical resistance and temperature in conductors
  • Learn about thermal conductivity and its impact on heat transfer in materials
  • Investigate the effects of geometry on resistance and thermal properties of conductors
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, physicists focusing on thermodynamics, and professionals involved in thermal management of electrical components.

Themadflower
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello !
1. Homework Statement

i study for my exams. here is my current problem:
a non-specific conductor is connected to an ideal battery (surrounding temperature: 20°C) and reaches a temperature of 24 °C . after cut in half it is again connected to the battery. what temperature does it reach now?

Homework Equations


that is all.

The Attempt at a Solution


i looked for equations to deal with the demand.. i used an equation from stackexchange:

P=I2∗R(T)
E(t)=∫Pdt
T=T0+dT
dT=E(t)mC
m=Vdensity
V=lA
R(T)=l/Ar(T)

The above can be condensed into a linear approximation:
R(T) =l/A∗(r+Tα)−>R(dT) =l/A∗(r0+dTα)

combining all this: dT =∫I2∗l/A∗(r0+dTα)dt/(lAdensityC)=I2/(A2∗densityC)∗∫r0+dTαdt

if dTα<<r0

then dT =I2∗r0∗dt/(A2∗densityC)

. i know the difference in temperatur is 4 K. so i transposed to get dT for which i put in the 4K then i figured out that the current should be the same so i took the same equation again without exchanging dt with 4 and took l/2 instead of l and well, than equated it. now i have an equation with lots of d´s (diameter) and l´s. so maybe that does not work.

i consider another way to deal with the temperature coefficient. i used that the resistance of the conductor changes with the temperature and is half less than before if we cut the conductor in half.. i used:
temperatur-widerstand-formel-gleichung.jpg


and just claimed that Rk (the R at the beginning) is 100 Ohm and dR is 50 Ohm ( because it is 1/2 Rk) and dT = 4K . then i have alpha.. i do not know how to continue, or if it is even right what i did.. could you help?

kind regards!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that the resistance did not depend on temperature. How would you solve the problem?
 
well, maybe i would it now is half as long as before so the temperatur rise will also be half dT1? that makes 2 K?
and a total temperatur of 26?

another idea would be to say, it is first: 20 + 1/5 *20 = 24
and now 24 + 1/5 * 1/2 *24 = 26,4
 
Themadflower said:
maybe i would it now is half as long as before so
If its original resistance was R, then once its length is halved what will its new resistance be?

How will its electrical watts compare with before?
 
R/2? could it be?
 
than m2 = m1 /2 .
if i take Q=c*m*dT = I^2 *R
-> dT = (I^2 *R)/(c*m) and dT2= (I^2 *R/2)/(c*m/2) which is the same as dT ...
 
NascentOxygen said:
If its original resistance was R, then once its length is halved what will its new resistance be?

How will its electrical watts compare with before?
Also, how will the current change?
 
it will double
 
Themadflower said:
than m2 = m1 /2 .
if i take Q=c*m*dT = I^2 *R
-> dT = (I^2 *R)/(c*m) and dT2= (I^2 *R/2)/(c*m/2) which is the same as dT ...
You should not be using the term involving the heat capacity since, when the resistor reaches a steady state temperature, it will not be storing any more thermal energy. All the generated energy will be transferring to the surroundings. Are you familiar with heat transfer mechanism of Newton's cooling?
 
  • #10
yes, does that mean it's not getting hotter at all? or can i simply use dT = I^2 * R and than see how the parameters are affected by cutting the conducter in half? than dt2 would be 8K
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Themadflower said:
yes, does that mean it's not getting hotter at all? or can i simply use dT = I^2 * R and than see how the parameters are affected by cutting the conducter in half? than dt2 would be 8K
Correct. ##\Delta T=k(I^2R)##, where k is a constant.
 
  • Like
Likes Themadflower
  • #12
than thank you for your help! now i understood !
 
  • #13
I agree the power doubles but what effect does halving the length have on the thermal conductivity?
 
  • #14
So dt is twice as high. Here dt2 is 8k
 
  • #15
CWatters said:
I agree the power doubles but what effect does halving the length have on the thermal conductivity?
The thermal conductivity is, of course, an intensive property of the material, so, when the amount of material changes, the thermal conductivity of the doesn't. In this problem, they expect the person to assume that the conductive heat transfer is very high, such that the dominant resistance to heat transfer is the convective heat transfer outside the resistor.

You make an important point. Since the heat transfer area is halved, the constant k doubles, and this brings about an additional factor of two increase in the temperature. I forgot to take this into account when I said that 4C was correct. The actual temperature rise should be 8 C.
 
  • #16
That's what I was trying to hint at but I make the answer 36C. The temperature delta was 4C, doubling the power makes it 8C and doubling the thermal resistance makes it 16C. Then 20+16=36C.
 
  • #17
CWatters said:
That's what I was trying to hint at but I make the answer 36C. The temperature delta was 4C, doubling the power makes it 8C and doubling the thermal resistance makes it 16C. Then 20+16=36C.
Yes. Thanks for the correction.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K