Calculate the bias of the estimator

  • Thread starter Thread starter dynas7y
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bias
dynas7y
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose that Y_1,...,Y_n is a random sample where the density of each random variable Y_i is f(y) = 2*x^2*y^(-3), y >= x for some parameter x > 1. Let x^hat := min{Y_1,...,Y_n}.

I figured out that the pdf for the minimum order statistic is n*[f(y)]*[1-F(y)]^(n-1).

Also I think that 1-F(y) = Integrate[2*x^2*t^(-3), t, y, Infinity] = x^2*y^(-2)

Plugging this into the pdf for the first order statistic, we have n*[2*x^2*y^(-3)]*[x^2*y^(-2)]^(n-1).

Now to find the bias we have that B(x^hat) = E(x^hat) - x

So I think E(x^hat) = Integrate[y*n*[2*x^2*y^(-3)]*[x^2*y^(-2)]^(n-1), y, x, Infinity].

This is where I am running into problems because I am finding it very difficult to get a "nice" integral here, in fact, using the limits of integration I have listed, I'm getting an indeterminant form so I'm guessing that this might be the problem. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to what I'm doing wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking about the integral

\int_x^\infty {y n 2 x^2 y^{-3} ( x^2 y^{-2})^{n-1} dy

= 2 n x^{2n} \int_x^\infty y^{-2n} dy
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Are you asking about the integral

\int_x^\infty {y n 2 x^2 y^{-3} ( x^2 y^{-2})^{n-1} dy

= 2 n x^{2n} \int_x^\infty y^{-2n} dy

I was, but I actually was able to get the answer. Thank you.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top