Calculate the bias of the estimator

  • Thread starter Thread starter dynas7y
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bias
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the bias of the estimator x^hat, defined as the minimum of a random sample from a specific probability density function. The user derived the probability density function for the minimum order statistic and attempted to find the expected value of x^hat to compute the bias. They encountered difficulties with the integral, leading to an indeterminate form, and sought guidance on resolving this issue. Ultimately, the user reported successfully finding the answer after further exploration. The conversation highlights the challenges in statistical estimation and the importance of understanding integrals in this context.
dynas7y
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose that Y_1,...,Y_n is a random sample where the density of each random variable Y_i is f(y) = 2*x^2*y^(-3), y >= x for some parameter x > 1. Let x^hat := min{Y_1,...,Y_n}.

I figured out that the pdf for the minimum order statistic is n*[f(y)]*[1-F(y)]^(n-1).

Also I think that 1-F(y) = Integrate[2*x^2*t^(-3), t, y, Infinity] = x^2*y^(-2)

Plugging this into the pdf for the first order statistic, we have n*[2*x^2*y^(-3)]*[x^2*y^(-2)]^(n-1).

Now to find the bias we have that B(x^hat) = E(x^hat) - x

So I think E(x^hat) = Integrate[y*n*[2*x^2*y^(-3)]*[x^2*y^(-2)]^(n-1), y, x, Infinity].

This is where I am running into problems because I am finding it very difficult to get a "nice" integral here, in fact, using the limits of integration I have listed, I'm getting an indeterminant form so I'm guessing that this might be the problem. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to what I'm doing wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking about the integral

\int_x^\infty {y n 2 x^2 y^{-3} ( x^2 y^{-2})^{n-1} dy

= 2 n x^{2n} \int_x^\infty y^{-2n} dy
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Are you asking about the integral

\int_x^\infty {y n 2 x^2 y^{-3} ( x^2 y^{-2})^{n-1} dy

= 2 n x^{2n} \int_x^\infty y^{-2n} dy

I was, but I actually was able to get the answer. Thank you.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top