Calculate the dose rate in a drum of U3O8

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the dose rate from a drum of U3O8, specifically focusing on how the volume or mass of the material might affect the dose rate experienced by an operator. The original poster is working within constraints that prohibit the use of numerical software and seeks to understand the relationship between the amount of radioactive material and the dose rate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether a linear relationship exists between the volume or mass of U3O8 and the dose rate, given a specific dose rate measurement at one meter from a full drum. Participants raise concerns about the assumptions of linearity and the effects of shielding on dose rate calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of the original poster's assumptions regarding dose rate and mass. Some guidance has been offered regarding the non-linear nature of dose rates due to shielding and the complexities involved with radioactive sources, but no consensus has been reached on the linearity of the relationship.

Contextual Notes

The original poster lacks specific data such as the density of U3O8 and the activity of the uranium, which are critical for accurate calculations. The discussion also acknowledges the potential real-world implications of the calculations in addition to their academic nature.

Supaylek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary:: Calcul of dose rate.

Hello everyone !
I have to calculate the total dose that an operator takes during different tasks in a workshop. .
I must not use numerical software, so it's only calculous with the data I have. My question could be considered as stupid but the engineer in charge of the radioprotection is not here and I don't find the solution on the internet.

Let's suppose we have had calculated the dose rate at one meter of a drum fulled of U3O8 (capacity of 213 liters) and the result is 2 µSv/h. Is it possible to apply a linear relationship between the volume of U3O8 (or mass) and the dose rate ? What would be the dose rate if the capacity of drum is around 118 litres, or if the drum is almost empty with only 100 grams remaining ? We keep a distance of one meter. I don't have access to the activity of the Uranium but only the dose rate at one meter.

Best

[Mentor Note -- Thread moved from the technical forums to the Schoolwork forums]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this an academic question or a real risk assessment?

Are these all the data points you have been given? You are quoting quantity in liters and grams, do you have the density?

A real drum of U3O8 would have self shielding, which makes the dose rate non linear with the mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Both academic question and real risk, it's a kind of project for my school.

Well, when I have the measurement 2 micro Sv/h at one meter, it already takes into account the shielding of the drum I guess. Forget about the mass, my question is more about the radioactive source. It's common that if we have more radioactive material, than the doser is higher. But is this linear ?
 
Neglecting shielding, radiation dose would be proportional to the activity of the source. Twice the source, twice the dose rate. Though you don't need it, it's also related to distance by the inverse squared law. So at 10 meters away, you would expect 1/100th of the dose rate.

The measured activity of uranium oxide is going to depend on more complex things, like how long since it was refined. U235 and U238 are alpha emitters, so they are not what you are detecting outside the drum. If you are very interested in the subject you could read about Uranium 'daughters' and which of those are removed by chemical extraction.

Assuming dose rate is linear to amount may be just fine for a school project. If you want to read more into the subject you can.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K