Calculate the dose rate in a drum of U3O8

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the dose rate for an operator working with a drum of U3O8, specifically addressing how to determine the dose rate based on volume and mass without numerical software. The initial dose rate at one meter from a full 213-liter drum is given as 2 µSv/h, raising questions about the linearity of dose rate with respect to the amount of uranium present. It is noted that while dose rate may be proportional to the activity of the radioactive source, real-world factors like self-shielding complicate this relationship. The conversation emphasizes that while the assumption of linearity could suffice for a school project, understanding the complexities of radioactive decay and shielding is beneficial for accurate assessments. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the balance between theoretical calculations and practical considerations in radiation safety.
Supaylek
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary:: Calcul of dose rate.

Hello everyone !
I have to calculate the total dose that an operator takes during different tasks in a workshop. .
I must not use numerical software, so it's only calculous with the data I have. My question could be considered as stupid but the engineer in charge of the radioprotection is not here and I don't find the solution on the internet.

Let's suppose we have had calculated the dose rate at one meter of a drum fulled of U3O8 (capacity of 213 liters) and the result is 2 µSv/h. Is it possible to apply a linear relationship between the volume of U3O8 (or mass) and the dose rate ? What would be the dose rate if the capacity of drum is around 118 litres, or if the drum is almost empty with only 100 grams remaining ? We keep a distance of one meter. I don't have access to the activity of the Uranium but only the dose rate at one meter.

Best

[Mentor Note -- Thread moved from the technical forums to the Schoolwork forums]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this an academic question or a real risk assessment?

Are these all the data points you have been given? You are quoting quantity in liters and grams, do you have the density?

A real drum of U3O8 would have self shielding, which makes the dose rate non linear with the mass.
 
Both academic question and real risk, it's a kind of project for my school.

Well, when I have the measurement 2 micro Sv/h at one meter, it already takes into account the shielding of the drum I guess. Forget about the mass, my question is more about the radioactive source. It's common that if we have more radioactive material, than the doser is higher. But is this linear ?
 
Neglecting shielding, radiation dose would be proportional to the activity of the source. Twice the source, twice the dose rate. Though you don't need it, it's also related to distance by the inverse squared law. So at 10 meters away, you would expect 1/100th of the dose rate.

The measured activity of uranium oxide is going to depend on more complex things, like how long since it was refined. U235 and U238 are alpha emitters, so they are not what you are detecting outside the drum. If you are very interested in the subject you could read about Uranium 'daughters' and which of those are removed by chemical extraction.

Assuming dose rate is linear to amount may be just fine for a school project. If you want to read more into the subject you can.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top