Calculate the radius of gyration for a plane figure

  • Thread starter Thread starter shishykish
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the radius of gyration for a plane figure defined by the curve xy = 4, bounded by the x-axis and vertical lines at x = 2 and x = 4. The moment of area is expressed as $$I = A k^2$$, where $$k$$ is the radius of gyration. The radius of gyration for a uniform rod is derived as $$k = \sqrt{\frac{a^3}{3}}$$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using calculus to sum elementary shapes, specifically thin rectangular strips, to determine the total moment of area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, particularly integration techniques.
  • Familiarity with the concept of moment of area in mechanics.
  • Knowledge of the radius of gyration and its application in structural analysis.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate LaTeX equations for mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the radius of gyration for various geometric shapes.
  • Learn about the application of the moment of area in structural engineering.
  • Explore integration techniques for calculating areas and moments in calculus.
  • Review the properties of 1D and 2D shapes in relation to their moments of inertia.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those focusing on structural mechanics and calculus applications in physics.

shishykish
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A plane figure is bounded by the curve xy = 4, the x-axis and the ordinates at x = 2 and x =4. Calculate
Relevant Equations
$$I = Ak^2$$
$$xy=4$$
Limits of x= 2 to x=4
Area of strip = $$/delta x /times y$$

Moment of area for strip $$= Area /times (radius of gyration)^2 $$
$$ = /delta x /times y /times (/frac{y^2}{3})^2 $$

Why is the radius of gyration squared term $$y^2$ over 3? $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
shishykish said:
Homework Statement: A plane figure is bounded by the curve xy = 4, the x-axis and the ordinates at x = 2 and x =4. Calculate
Relevant Equations: $$I = Ak^2$$
$$xy=4$$
Limits of x= 2 to x=4

Area of strip = $$\delta x \times y$$

Moment of area for strip $$= Area \times (radius of gyration)^2 $$
$$ = \delta x \times y \times (\frac{y^2}{3})^2 $$
I have corrected your LaTeX symbols from "/" to "\".
Presumably you meant ## \delta x \times y \times (\frac{y^2}{3})##
shishykish said:
Why is the radius of gyration squared term $$y^2/ 3$$?
What is the radius of gyration of a uniform rod?
 
haruspex said:
I have corrected your LaTeX symbols from "/" to "\".
Presumably you meant ## \delta x \times y \times (\frac{y^2}{3})##
[]
What is the radius of gyration of a uniform rod?
radius of gyration for a uniform rod is $$ k= \sqrt{ \frac{a^3}{3} }$$from what I remember of deriving it from my notes. So we are actually taking this shape as an elementary strip between the limits of 2 to 4. The total moment of area will be the $$ I_{area} = area \times (radius of gyration)^2 $$
 
Last edited:
shishykish said:
Homework Statement: A plane figure is bounded by the curve xy = 4, the x-axis and the ordinates at x = 2 and x =4. Calculate
Presumably the missing phrase at the end of the sentence is something like: "the radius of gyration about the x-axis".

It is important that the required axis of rotation is clear. For example it could easily be the axis perpendicular to the plane passing through the centre of mass.
 
Ha! Yes it is. I really could learn how to copy and paste properly!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
haruspex said:
I have corrected your LaTeX symbols from "/" to "\".
Presumably you meant ## \delta x \times y \times (\frac{y^2}{3})##

What is the radius of gyration of a uniform rod?
Hi! So I should be thinking conceptually in terms of calculus. Taking an elementary shape then summing over the whole object is one of the most basic approaches.
 
shishykish said:
radius of gyration for a uniform rod is $$ k= \sqrt{ \frac{a^3}{3} }$$
That’s dimensionality wrong. Is it a typo?
shishykish said:
So I should be thinking conceptually in terms of calculus.
Yes, but it is ok to use standard results too. In this problem you have a nonstandard 2D shape that can be represented as a collection of 1D standard shapes - thin rectangular strips that can be taken to be so thin as to be 1D rods.
Work from first principles (the radius of gyration of a point mass at a given distance from an axis) and integrate twice, or skip the first integration by quoting the result for a 1D rod.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
816
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K