Calculate the wavelength of electrons traveling at 1.15x10^5

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the wavelength of electrons traveling at a velocity of 1.15 x 105 m/s using the de Broglie wavelength formula, λ = h/(m*v). Given Planck's constant (h = 6.626 x 10-34 J*s) and the mass of an electron (m = 9.11 x 10-31 kg), the calculated wavelength is 6.00 x 10-9 m, which converts to 6.33 nm. The discrepancy in the results prompts a review of arithmetic rather than a fundamental error in the formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the de Broglie wavelength formula
  • Familiarity with SI units and unit conversion
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics concepts
  • Proficiency in arithmetic operations involving scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the implications of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the significance of nanometers in measuring wavelengths
  • Investigate the relationship between electron speed and energy calculations
  • Review the principles of energy content in different materials for comparison
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in the properties of electrons and their wave-like behavior.

Anna Davis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the wavelength of electrons traveling at 1.15x10^5 m/s

Homework Equations


λ = h/m*v

Given values:
h=6.626x10^-34 J*s
m=9.11x10^-31kg
v=1.15x10^5 m/s

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted J*s to SI units (kg⋅m2⋅s−2) and then substituted out all known values, to get:
λ = (6.626x10^-34 kg⋅m2⋅s−2)/(9.11x10^-31kg)(1.15x10^5 m/s)

After canceling out like units and doing the math, I get:
λ = 6.00x10^-9m

The text gives the solution as 6.33nm. I can't figure out how they got there (and why they converted to nm?).

Is this an error in the text or (more likely) in my logic/calcuations?

Any/all input is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anna Davis said:
The text gives the solution as 6.33nm. I can't figure out how they got there (and why they converted to nm?).
Your expression is correct, just redo the arithmetic. For wavelengths that small, nm is a typical unit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anna Davis
Ah, good to know about nm... And I'll do the math again (hopefully better!). Thanks :)
 
If interested, and using the wavelength determined in the above problem, calculate the amount of energy in 1 gram of electrons moving at the same speed. (See if you can get ∆E = 1.9 x 104Kj/mole e-'s = 3.45 x 107Kj/g e-'s. Compare: A candle flame generating q ~ 40.7 Kj/g from burning paraffin wax to the energy content of a gram of electrons traveling at 1.15 x 105m/s. => You might find it very surprising. You are definitely on the right track. Good job!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K