Undergrad Calculating a particular amplitude with Feynman diagrams

Click For Summary
To calculate the probability amplitude for an electron and positron annihilating into photons using Feynman diagrams, it's essential to learn the proper notation and methodology, preferably through a Quantum Field Theory (QFT) textbook like Peskin & Schroeder. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using LaTeX for clarity in presenting equations, as this facilitates better communication and assistance from others. Participants suggest starting with foundational knowledge from textbooks before seeking help on specific steps or clarifications. It is also advised to reference specific pages and equations when asking for further assistance. Mastering these concepts and tools will enhance understanding and problem-solving in QFT.
Ringo Hendrix
Messages
9
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
This isn’t homework, I’m self taught. Pardon me for using pictures instead of typing out equations, I have no clue how to do that. So please don’t downvote this for that :-) I’m just really desperate to learn this.
So I’m trying to compute the probability amplitude of an electron with momentum p1 and a positron with momentum p2 annihilating into a photons with momenta q1 and q2.

My question is how do you use Feynman diagrams to calculate the first and second order expansions (seen in the third image)? I wouldn’t mind a step-by-step with minimal assumption similar to the pictures I posted. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Again I’m sorry about the pictures, but I really am unsure how to type out the equations but I hope and assume my writing is legible enough.

What I have so far
59624B62-B3ED-462E-BAA2-1AA4FEB87D5E.jpeg

59BCDEC6-11B1-4A49-AF19-CC4439537269.jpeg

9FDB9BCD-411B-468A-BE14-C9DB0CDC6794.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 7B979D15-FFE5-4414-B78A-CC9B5C69FACC.jpeg
    7B979D15-FFE5-4414-B78A-CC9B5C69FACC.jpeg
    47.2 KB · Views: 321
Physics news on Phys.org
Ringo Hendrix said:
I really am unsure how to type out the equations

You do it using LaTeX:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
Please take the time to learn it and use it to type your equations. The issue is not just legibility but being able to quote parts of your post in responses; we can't do that if all the equations are in images. That makes it much harder for people to help you.
 
  • Like
Likes Ringo Hendrix
Ringo Hendrix said:
This isn’t homework, I’m self taught. [...] I’m just really desperate to learn this.
But,... presumably you are learning from QFT textbook(s), yes? If so, which one(s)? If not, go get a copy of (e.g.,) Peskin & Schroeder.

My question is how do you use Feynman diagrams to calculate the first and second order expansions (seen in the third image)? [...] I wouldn’t mind a step-by-step with minimal assumption [...]
Any respectable QFT textbook should do that. Best to try and learn from the textbook first, then come back here to clarify any details or steps that you don't follow, or can't figure out (but if you do this, be sure to cite page+eqn numbers in the book).
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K