Using Feynman rules to calculate amplitude
- Context: Graduate
- Thread starter Higgsy
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the application of Feynman rules to calculate Feynman amplitudes, specifically in the context of vacuum Feynman diagrams for $$\phi^4$$ scalar theory. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings and practical steps involved in this calculation.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about the method for applying Feynman rules to calculate amplitudes from a given diagram.
- Another participant suggests that the process is covered in standard quantum field theory (QFT) textbooks, prompting a question about the source of the original diagram.
- A participant challenges the classification of the diagrams presented, stating they do not resemble Feynman diagrams.
- A participant identifies the diagrams as vacuum Feynman diagrams for $$\phi^4$$ scalar theory, referencing Srednicki as a source, but notes that these specific calculations are not included in that text.
- It is explained that the vacuum "bubble" diagrams contribute to the vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude in perturbation theory and that they cancel in the LSZ reduction formula when evaluating S-matrix elements.
- A detailed mathematical expression is provided for evaluating the diagrams using Feynman rules and dimensional regularization, including a symmetry factor and the final dimensional regularization expression.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the classification of the diagrams or the necessity of the vacuum diagrams in the context of S-matrix elements. Multiple viewpoints regarding the application of Feynman rules and the relevance of the diagrams remain present.
Contextual Notes
There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the diagrams and the specific context in which the Feynman rules are applied. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in the evaluation process.
Similar threads
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 33 ·
- · Replies 89 ·
- · Replies 14 ·
- · Replies 5 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 57 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 1 ·