MHB Calculating angles for a physical regular icosahedron

AI Thread Summary
To build a regular icosahedron, 20 equilateral triangles are required for the faces. The key challenge is determining the angles needed to join these triangles into a 3D shape, specifically the dihedral angle between two faces. This angle can be found in the properties table of the regular icosahedron, which is available on resources like Wikipedia. For practical construction, understanding the dihedral angle is essential for accurate assembly. The discussion emphasizes the importance of geometry in woodworking projects.
hephalumph
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is actually for a wood shop project... but it certainly involves geometry! I am trying to build a real-world regular icosahedron. I know I need 20 equilateral triangles for the faces. But I do not know what the angles of the sides/thickness should be, to join those 20 triangles into a 3D shape. Nor do I know how to calculate it. I'll be perfectly honest - this is not some homework or test that I *have* to figure it out for myself and show proof of work, so if someone wants to just post the answer, I am fine with that. But if you want to make me work for it, giving me the formula as a starting point, (and probably working with me to verify I solved it correctly) is okay too.

Thanks in Advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hephalumph said:
This is actually for a wood shop project... but it certainly involves geometry! I am trying to build a real-world regular icosahedron. I know I need 20 equilateral triangles for the faces. But I do not know what the angles of the sides/thickness should be, to join those 20 triangles into a 3D shape. Nor do I know how to calculate it. I'll be perfectly honest - this is not some homework or test that I *have* to figure it out for myself and show proof of work, so if someone wants to just post the answer, I am fine with that. But if you want to make me work for it, giving me the formula as a starting point, (and probably working with me to verify I solved it correctly) is okay too.

Thanks in Advance!

Good afternoon,

have a look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_icosahedron

If I understand you correctly you are looking for the dihedral angle between two faces. You'll find the value of this angle in the table of properties of the icosahedron.
 
If you already know this, it's no help. But here's a way to construct an icosahedron:

35bxjwk.png
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top