Calculating Atomic Spacing for Iron Cube

  • Thread starter Thread starter korkox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Iron
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The atomic spacing for a cube of iron can be calculated using its density and mass. A 56-gram cube of iron, with a density of 7.9 grams per cubic centimeter, has a volume of approximately 7.1 cubic centimeters. This volume contains Avogadro's number of atoms, approximately 6.0 x 1023 atoms, leading to a calculated atomic volume of about 1.2 x 10-23 cubic centimeters. Consequently, the linear dimension of one iron atom is determined to be approximately 2.3 x 10-8 centimeters, or 2.3 Angstroms (0.23 nanometers).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Avogadro's number
  • Basic knowledge of density calculations
  • Familiarity with cubic lattice structures
  • Concept of atomic volume and dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of cubic lattice structures in metals
  • Learn about density and its role in material science
  • Explore the significance of Avogadro's number in chemistry
  • Study atomic dimensions and their implications in nanotechnology
USEFUL FOR

Students in materials science, chemists, physicists, and anyone interested in the atomic structure of metals, particularly iron.

korkox
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How do u calculate the atomic spacing on an iron cube? Can someone please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean iron with a cubic lattice?

And what do you know? You cannot calculate anything unless you start with something you know.
 
OK. Let's consider a 56 gram cube of iron. Using a density of 7.9 grams per cc, this cube is about 7.1 cubic cm. It contains Avagadro's nomber of atoms, or 6.0 x 10^23 atoms. So the volume of one atom is about 1.2 x 10^-23 cm^3. Therefore the linear dimension is the cube root, or 2.3 x 10^-8 cm, or about 2.3 Angstroms (0.23 nanometers).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K