MHB Calculating Ball Height and Time with Quadratic Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application Ball
AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for a ball thrown upward to land, set the height equation h = -16t^2 + 96t to zero and solve for t. The quadratic formula can be rearranged to t = (12 ± √(144 - h)) / 4, allowing for quick calculations of time at various heights. For the height of 80 feet, there are two solutions because the ball reaches this height on its way up and again on its way down. The maximum height of the ball is 144 feet, occurring at t = 3 seconds. This approach simplifies finding the time for any specified height without repeatedly solving the quadratic equation.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
A ball is thrown straight upward. Suppose that the height of the ball at time t is h = -16t^2 + 96t, where h is in feet and t is in seconds, with t = 0 corresponding to the instant the ball is first tossed.

A. How long does it take for the ball to land?

To do A, I must let h = 0 and solve for t, right?

B. At what time is the height 80 feet? Why does B have two answers?

To do B, I must let h = 80 and solve for t, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
A ball is thrown straight upward. Suppose that the height of the ball at time t is h = -16t^2 + 96t, where h is in feet and t is in seconds, with t = 0 corresponding to the instant the ball is first tossed.

A. How long does it take for the ball to land?

To do A, I must let h = 0 and solve for t, right?

B. At what time is the height 80 feet? Why does B have two answers?

To do B, I must let h = 80 and solve for t, right?

Yes that is what you need to do for both.
 
Good. I will answer both parts tonight.
 
Since you are asked multiple questions regarding finding the time when the ball is a certain height, what I recommend is solving the given relation between height $h$ and time $t$ for $t$, so that you then have a formula to use. We are given:

$$h=-16t^2+96t$$

Arrange this as:

$$16t^2-96t+h=0$$

Now use the quadratic formula to obtain:

$$t=\frac{12\pm\sqrt{144-h}}{4}$$

Now it's just a matter of plugging in any given height to find the time when that height occurs, rather than having to solve a quadratic equation every time a new height is introduced. We can also easily see that the maximum height is 144 and occurs at time $t=3$. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Since you are asked multiple questions regarding finding the time when the ball is a certain height, what I recommend is solving the given relation between height $h$ and time $t$ for $t$, so that you then have a formula to use. We are given:

$$h=-16t^2+96t$$

Arrange this as:

$$16t^2-96t+h=0$$

Now use the quadratic formula to obtain:

$$t=\frac{12\pm\sqrt{144-h}}{4}$$

Now it's just a matter of plugging in any given height to find the time when that height occurs, rather than having to solve a quadratic equation every time a new height is introduced. We can also easily see that the maximum height is 144 and occurs at time $t=3$. :D

Nicely done. You created an equation similar to the quadratic formula.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top