Calculating Capacity of Steel Rack: Yield Stress Issues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the load capacity of steel racks constructed from layered steel pipes, which can support approximately 25 tons before yielding. The user is attempting to compute the yield stress using the formula for stress (force over area) but is confused by the resulting kilopascal values, as yield stresses are typically expressed in megapascals (MPa). The conversation highlights the importance of professional engineering oversight for such calculations, especially in safety-critical applications like gear and pulley overhauls.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of yield stress and its significance in material science
  • Familiarity with stress calculations (force over area)
  • Knowledge of units of measurement, specifically kilopascals (kPa) and megapascals (MPa)
  • Basic principles of structural engineering and load-bearing calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between kilopascals and megapascals in material strength contexts
  • Learn about the factors of safety in structural engineering
  • Study the principles of load distribution in multi-layered rack systems
  • Consult guidelines for professional engineering practices in load calculations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, safety professionals, and anyone involved in the design and assessment of load-bearing structures, particularly in industrial settings where heavy machinery and equipment are stored.

RJCanz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Load capacity on Racks with steel pipes as load carrier
Hi guys. Recently I've been assigned to know / calculate the capacity of the racks in our section. Our racks has layered steel pipes that are carrying the loads. After actual testing it can carry a load around 25 tons after yielding or having a bend. So my next step was to calculate for its yield stress so I can calculated an allowable stress and an allowable load with a factor of safety right after. However, after calculating it's stress in which I used force over area (A = 3 sq.m.) I calculated a stress which only results to a kilopascal value while I have searched yield stresses of some materias are mostly in megapascals(MPa) is there wrong with my calculations? If there is, can you help me. Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. :smile:
RJCanz said:
Summary:: Load capacity on Racks with steel pipes as load carrier

Recently I've been assigned to know / calculate the capacity of the racks in our section. Our racks has layered steel pipes that are carrying the loads. After actual testing it can carry a load around 25 tons after yielding or having a bend.
That's a pretty heavy load! What is the application? If the racks fail, where does the load fall?

And why have you been assigned this calculation if you have to ask for help on the Internet? Seems strange to me...
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

That's a pretty heavy load! What is the application? If the racks fail, where does the load fall?

And why have you been assigned this calculation if you have to ask for help on the Internet? Seems strange to me...
Apparently our boss doesn't know its capacity in tons so he assigned me to do it. Our section is overhauling of gearboxes, pulleys etc. And after these are fixed it is stacked in those racks. Our racks has 2-3 layers and the 25tons I have said was the capacity only of 1 layer. But I wondered when I computed for the stress with that known weight it is only in kilopascals so I wonder if it's wrong bc I have seen mostly stress capacities are is mega pascals
 
I'm guessing that you are not based in the US, because (hopefully) we would require professional engineer certification to be doing calculations like this. I will temporarily lock this thread to ask the other Mentors whether we should allow your thread to go forward...

UPDATE -- The thread will remain closed. Please seek the help of a professional engineer and have your insurance company sign off on the final design. Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
18K