Calculating Change in Volume at 8.80 km Deep

  • Thread starter Thread starter starfish794
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Volume
AI Thread Summary
At a depth of 8.80 km in the ocean, the pressure is approximately 9.08 x 10^7 N/m², significantly affecting water density, which is calculated to be 1052.88 kg/m³. The discussion centers on calculating the change in volume of 1.00 m³ of water under this pressure, with some participants questioning why the expected change isn't zero. The use of the formula pv = pv is suggested to determine the volume change. Participants also inquire about the methods used to derive the density at this depth. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately assessing the effects of deep-sea pressure on water volume.
starfish794
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Consider a point in the ocean about 8.80 km deep. The pressure at that point is huge, about 9.08 107 N/m2.
(a) Calculate the change in volume of 1.00 m3 of water carried from the surface to this point in the ocean.

I don't get why the answer isn't zero. But anyway, I found the density at that point to be 1052.88 kg/m^3. Should I be using pv=pv to find the change in volume?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
starfish794 said:
Consider a point in the ocean about 8.80 km deep. The pressure at that point is huge, about 9.08 107 N/m2.
(a) Calculate the change in volume of 1.00 m3 of water carried from the surface to this point in the ocean.

I don't get why the answer isn't zero. But anyway, I found the density at that point to be 1052.88 kg/m^3. Should I be using pv=pv to find the change in volume?
Someone else is looking at this same problem but with a somewhat different depth number. What information did you use to get that density?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=143100
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top