Calculating De Broglie Wavelength of a 100g Ball

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The de Broglie wavelength of a 100-gram ball traveling at 100 miles per hour (44.704 m/s) is calculated using the formula λ = h/p, resulting in a wavelength of 1.48 x 10-24 angstroms. While the approach to calculate the wavelength is correct, measuring such a small wavelength presents significant challenges. Compton scattering is not applicable to macroscopic objects like a ball, and the wavelength is much smaller than any realistic target size. Alternative methods, such as diffraction through a narrow slit, also face practical limitations in achieving measurable results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of de Broglie wavelength and its calculation using λ = h/p
  • Familiarity with Compton scattering and its principles
  • Knowledge of diffraction and its application in wave mechanics
  • Basic dimensional analysis and unit conversion (e.g., miles per hour to meters per second)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of de Broglie wavelength and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Compton scattering and its limitations in measuring macroscopic objects
  • Investigate diffraction techniques and their applications in measuring wavelengths
  • Study the relationship between particle velocity, angle of trajectory, and wavelength calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying quantum mechanics, physicists interested in wave-particle duality, and researchers exploring experimental methods for measuring small wavelengths.

Rachael_Victoria
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Ok so my homework question says find the de broglie wavelength of a 100 gram ball traveling at 100 miles per hour. So do a little dimensional analysis and 100 mph is 44.704 m/s and since the de broglie wavelength is found with lamda=h/p and p=mv then I am good to go, I get 1.48 x 10^(-24) angstroms for my wavelength.
It then goes on to say "is there any experimental method by which a wavelength of this size might be measured?" So I was thinking you could throw that ball at something stationary, use the equation for compton scattered wavelength and replace c with v (or the 44.704 m/s) and theta with the angle of trajectory, this would give you a calculated wavelength for the ball after having hit something. Then measure the new velocity after impact and actually calculate the new wavelength using the de broglie equation. Am i way off?
thanks
rachael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Compton scattering is when a photon scatters against an electron. The photon is a relativistic particle; you can't use the same idea with a 100 gram ball.

Find the approximate sizes of atoms, nuclei and so. Then compare it with your 10^{-24} angstrom.
 


Your approach to calculating the de Broglie wavelength of the 100 gram ball is correct. Using the equation λ = h/mv, we can calculate the wavelength to be 1.48 x 10^(-24) angstroms.

As for the experimental method to measure such a small wavelength, your idea of using Compton scattering could work. However, there are some limitations to consider. Firstly, the wavelength of the ball would have to be comparable to the size of the target it is being thrown at. In this case, the wavelength is much smaller than the size of any target we could realistically use. Additionally, the angle of trajectory would have to be precisely measured in order to accurately calculate the new wavelength using the de Broglie equation. Any slight error in the angle measurement could result in a significantly different calculated wavelength.

Another possible method could be to use diffraction. If the ball is thrown through a narrow slit or passed through a diffraction grating, the resulting diffraction pattern could be used to calculate the wavelength. However, the ball would have to be thrown with a very precise velocity and angle in order to produce a measurable diffraction pattern.

Overall, while your idea of using Compton scattering is on the right track, it may not be a practical method for measuring the de Broglie wavelength of a 100 gram ball. Other methods, such as diffraction, may also have limitations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K