Calculating Displacement with Air Drag: A Differential Equation Approach

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating displacement of a sphere under the influence of a force and air drag, represented by the drag force equation \(\vec{D}=-c_1v-c_2v^2\). The correct approach involves solving the differential equation \(a=\frac{dv}{dt}=A-Bv-Cv^2\) using separation of variables, leading to expressions for displacement \(s(t)\) after time \(t\). The conversation highlights the importance of correctly modeling drag forces and provides integral solutions for displacement, emphasizing the need for accurate constants in the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with drag force concepts in physics
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, including partial fraction decomposition
  • Basic principles of kinematics and dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations
  • Learn about air resistance modeling and its impact on projectile motion
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations in physics
  • Investigate the implications of quadratic drag forces in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students interested in dynamics, particularly those working with projectile motion and fluid dynamics, will benefit from this discussion.

Espen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework problem, just an idea I had.

If we have a sphere which is being accelerated in space by a force \vec{F} and we take the drag into account, what would the displacement be after t seconds? If the drag force is \vec{D}=-c_1v-c_2v^2, then the acceleration would be \vec{a}=\frac{\vec{F}+\vec{D}}{m} \,,\, a=\frac{F-c_1v-c_2v^2}{m} such that the displacement s=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{F-c_1v-c_2v^2}{m}\right)t^2. Is this correct? Could someone help me solve this differential equation, if it has a solution?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's not the correct formula for the displacement. The well-known s=\frac{1}{2}at^{2} holds only if the acceleration is constant. In this case, the acceleration is a quadratic function of velocity, so we have one scalar differential equation:
a=\frac{dv}{dt}=A-Bv-Cv^{2}
where A= F/m, B=C1/m and C=C2/m are constants. The equation can be solved using separation of variables, as
(1) \int dt=\int\frac{dv}{A-Bv-Cv^{2}}

I can solve this easily if either B or C is equal to zero.
  • D=-c_{1}v
    Then by solving (1), and then another integration with respect to time, we get (for v(0) = 0)
    s(t)=\frac{F}{c_{1}}\left(t+\frac{exp(-\frac{c_{1}}{m}t)-1}{\frac{c_{1}}{m}}\right)
    where s(t) is the displacement after time t.
  • D=-c_{2}v^{2}

    v_{m}=\sqrt{\frac{F}{c_{2}}}
    is the terminal velocity (where D=F). Then using partial fraction decomposition on (1), integration and then another integration with recpect to time, we get (again for zero velocity at the begining):
    s(t)=\frac{v_{m}m}{\sqrt{Fc_{2}}}ln cosh\left(t\frac{\sqrt{Fc_{2}}}{m}\right)
    where s(t) is the displacement at time t.

I'm too lazy at the moment to solve the problem for generally non-zero C1 and non-zero C2, which should be possible, but some difficulties might be encountered when inverting the function. I hope you got the picture how it works. Also, you can use numerical solution of the equation, which is the common approach in physics.

And finally, I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my English or incorrect English math terms.
 
I solved the integral to

\int \frac{dv}{A-Bv-Cv^2}=-\frac{2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{B+2Cv}{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}\right)}{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}, so then t=-\frac{2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{B+2Cv}{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}\right)}{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}

Working with this, I get that

v=\frac{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}\tan\left(\frac{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}{2}t\right)-B}{2C}

If this is correct, I want to integrate it in order to get an expression for the displacement over time.

s=\int \frac{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}{2C}\cdot\tan\left(\frac{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}{2}t\right)-\frac{B}{2C}\rm{d}t

I will simplify it be setting \frac{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}{2}=k_1 and get

s=\frac{k_1}{C}\cdot\int\tan\left(k_1\cdot t\right)\rm{d}t-\int\frac{B}{2C}\rm{d}t=\frac{k_1}{C}\left(-\frac{\log\left(\cos\left(k_1t\right)\right)}{k_1}\right)-\frac{B}{2C}t+s_0

How does this look?
 
Espen said:
t=-\frac{2\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{B+2Cv}{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}\right)}{\sqrt{-B^2-4AC}}
By tan^{-1} you mean tanh^{-1}, right? Also note that the expression \sqrt{-B^2-4AC} would be imaginary, since constants A, B and C are positive.
My solution of the integral is:

t=\frac{1}{\sqrt{B^2+4AC}}ln\left(\frac{\sqrt{B^2+4AC}+B+2Cv}{\sqrt{B^2+4AC}-B-2Cv}\right)

which could be written like yours considering the fact that:
\frac{1}{2}ln\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)=tanh^{-1}

The rest seems fine, it is even consistent with my solution for B=0.
 
Last edited:
Do remember, though, that the proper quadratic law for the air drag is -cv|v|, rather than -cv^{2} for some constant c.
 
arildno said:
Do remember, though, that the proper quadratic law for the air drag is -cv|v|, rather than -cv^{2} for some constant c.
But since the drag force acts in opposite direction to the velocity, for an accelerating force F we can use scalar equations with F_{d}=-cv^{2}. So the above calculations are correct.
 
Well, that would depend upon the problem you were to model with this.
If you think of, say, launched projectile problem within a constant gravity field, then the general form is necessary.

The force law on the way up (velocity "positive") wll go as -cv^2, whereas on its way down (velocity "negative") as +cv^2.
 
The better general formula then would be
\vec{F_{d}}=-cv^{2}\vec{\hat{v}},
where \vec{\hat{v}} is a unit vector codirectional with velocity.
But anyway, with some common sense you can always decide the correct direction of the drag force, so it doesn't accelerate the projectile.
Simple }-cv^{2} is a much better function to calculate with, than some expression with an absolute value.
I agree with you and understand your point. Thanks for the comment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
4K