Calculating divergence as a function of radius

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the divergence of various radially symmetrical fields as a function of radius. Members clarify that the divergence must be calculated for specific vector fields, not scalar fields, and emphasize the need for fields that meet the criteria of being constant or inversely proportional to the radius. There is confusion regarding the correct formulation of these fields, with suggestions to refer to examples provided in previous posts. Additionally, members discuss the expression for divergence in cylindrical coordinates as a necessary step in solving the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector fields in the context of divergence calculations.
Caleb Jones
{Moderator note: Member advised to retain and use the formatting template when starting a thread in the homework sections}

Hey guys

Question:
Calculate the divergence as a function of radius for each of the following radially
symmetrical fields in which the magnitude of the field vector:
(a) is constant;
(b) is inversely proportional to the radius;
(c) is inversely proportional to the square of the radius;
(d) is inversely proportional to the cube of the radius.

Im completely stumped on this question...
What I've got so far: (None of this was provided in the question)
Radial field:
V = 1/r2 (Vector "r")
Divergence of a spherical Shell:

div F = ∇⋅F

Flux through a spherical shell:
∅ = ∫ E.dA ---> E Constant
∅ = E ∫ dA
∅ = E×4(pi)×r2

Im not sure if I'm on the right path here though

Cheers
Caleb
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Caleb Jones said:
Radial field:
V = 1/r2 (Vector "r")
That is a scalar field, not a vector field. A vector field could be ##\vec F = \vec r##, for example.
You'll have to find the correct fields first.
 
  • Like
Likes Caleb Jones
mfb said:
That is a scalar field, not a vector field. A vector field could be ##\vec F = \vec r##, for example.
You'll have to find the correct fields first.
Thank you mfb
How do I find these fields?
Can I just use any symmetric field?
Sorry for my lack of knowledge, this hasn't been explained in lectures or in our lecture notes
 
Caleb Jones said:
Can I just use any symmetric field?
You'll need a field that is (a) constant with r, (b) inversely proportional to the radius, and so on. The field I gave as example is proportional to the radius.
 
Follow post #4 to get your 4 fields. His example (field proportional to r) could also be written F = k1 r with r as the unit vector so Fr = k1 where F = Fr r.

What is the expression for ∇⋅ F for cylindrical coordinates? Look it up most anywhere. Rest is a gimme.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
819
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K