Calculating Eigenvalues: 0 Root Meanings

  • Thread starter Thread starter wakko101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues Root
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of obtaining a zero eigenvalue when calculating eigenvalues for a matrix, particularly in relation to eigenvectors and matrix properties.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the significance of a zero eigenvalue, discussing its implications for the singularity of the matrix and the nature of the corresponding eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

Several participants have contributed insights regarding the meaning of a zero eigenvalue, with some noting that it indicates the matrix is singular and affects the uniqueness of eigenvectors. There is an ongoing exploration of definitions and properties related to eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that eigenvectors cannot be zero and discuss the implications of non-uniqueness in the context of eigenvalues, particularly when zero is involved. There is also a reference to the scalar field GF(2), which introduces a specific mathematical context for discussion.

wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
This is just a general question:

If, when you are calculating the eigenvalues for a matrix, you get a root of 0 (eg. x^3 - x) --> x(x-1)(x+1), what does that mean for the eigenvectors?

thanks,
w.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing. It just means that one of the eigenvalues is zero, it doesn't mean anything special about eigenvectors... When diagonalized the matrix of the operator looks like
<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> -1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0&amp; 0 &amp; 1<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)\;.<br />
In this basis, the eigenvector with eigenvalue -1 is (1,0,0) and the eigenvector with eigenvalue 0 is (0,1,0) and the eigenvector with eigenvalue 1 is (0,0,1).
 
There is nothing wrong with an eigenvalue being zero, and it is not more special than an eigenvalue being -1, i or \pi.

Only an eigenvector cannot be zero. Which makes sense, because the zero vector trivially satisfies A 0 = \lambda 0 for any number \lambda.
 
A zero eigenvalue means the matrix in question is singular. The eigenvectors corresponding to the zero eigenvalues form the basis for the null space of the matrix.
 
According to definition: Ax=cx,x is nonzero vector,then
we have Ax=0,
which means it has nonzero solutions,
also means A is signular,
also means the corresponding eigenvector is not uniquely determined.
 
uiulic said:
also means the corresponding eigenvector is not uniquely determined.
Eigenvectors are never1 uniquely determined; at the very least, any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is an eigenvector.

1: Unless your scalar field is GF(2).
 
And who, might I ask, is GF(2) ? :eek:
 
Thank Hurkyl for pointing out my misunderstanding (I was thinking about sth else.)
 
GF(2) is the finite field with two elements. It's isomorphic to the integers modulo 2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K