Calculating Electric Field at Point P(0,0'03,0'04)

AI Thread Summary
At point P(0, 0.03, 0.04), the total electric field is the sum of the fields from a sphere and a plane, calculated as E_T = E_σ + E_0, resulting in 30131.83 V/m. The vertical electric field E_σ and the electric field E_0, which has both vertical and horizontal components, do not point in the same direction. To correctly combine these fields, vector components must be used, and a vector diagram is recommended for clarity. The separation of E_0 into components can be achieved using sine and cosine functions based on the angle with respect to the axes. Utilizing the unit vector approach simplifies the calculations for determining the direction of E_0.
Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
We have a sphere of radius ##R=6\, \textrm{cm}## charged with a volume density of charge ##\rho =10\, \mu \textrm{C}/\textrm{m}^3## centered at the origin of coordinates. An infinite plane located in the ##z=0##-plane will be charged with a surface charge density ##\sigma =0,2\, \mu \textrm{C}/\textrm{m}^2##. What is the modulus of the electric field at its point ##(0,3,4)\, \textrm{cm}?

Answer: ##2,87\cdot 10^4\, \textrmV}/\textrm{m}##
Relevant Equations
##E_\sigma=\dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}##
Captura de 2022-03-21 20-39-47.png

At point ##P(0,0'03,0'04)## the field caused by the sphere is added to the field caused by the plane.
First, ##E_\sigma##
$$E_\sigma=\dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}=\dfrac{0,2\cdot 10^{-6}}{2\varepsilon_0}=11299,44\, \textrm{V}/\textrm{m}$$
Then, ##E_0##: Because ##r<R##:
$$E_0=\dfrac{\rho}{3\varepsilon_0}r=\dfrac{10^{-6}\cdot 10}{3\varepsilon_0}$$
We see that ##r=|\vec{r}|=\sqrt{0,03^2+0,04^2}=0,05\, \textrm{m}## because ##\vec{r}=(0,0'03,0'04)-(0,0,0)=(0,0'03,0'04)##. Then,
$$E_0=\dfrac{10\cdot 10^{-6}}{3\varepsilon_0}\cdot 0,05=18832,39\, \textrm{V}/\textrm{m}$$
Finally,
$$E_T=E_\sigma +E_0=18832,39+11299,44=30131,83\, \textrm{V}/\textrm{m}$$

I don't get the solution I should give, should I have done modulus instead of direct summation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the two electric fields ##\vec E_0## and ##\vec E_{\sigma}## point in the same direction at the point (0, 3 cm, 4 cm)?
 
TSny said:
Do the two electric fields ##\vec E_0## and ##\vec E_{\sigma}## point in the same direction at the point (0, 3 cm, 4cm)?
No. ##\vec E_{\sigma}## is vertical, and the other has vertical and horizontal components, doesn't it?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
No. ##\vec E_{\sigma}## is vertical, and the other has vertical and horizontal components, doesn't it?
Right.
 
TSny said:
Right.
But how do I separate the ##\vec E_0##? The formula is:
$$E_0=\dfrac{\rho}{3\varepsilon_0}r$$
 
Guillem_dlc said:
But how do I separate the ##\vec E_0##?
To find the components of ##\vec E_0## use your knowledge of the direction of ##\vec E_0##. A vector diagram can be helpful.
 
TSny said:
To find the components of ##\vec E_0## use your knowledge of the direction of ##\vec E_0##. A vector diagram can be helpful.
Right. With sine and cosine, right? And I find the angle with the point. Then I multiply the result I have by these and it will give me the two axes, won't it?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
Right. With sine and cosine, right? And I find the angle with the point. Then I multiply the result I have by these and it will give me the two axes, won't it?
That sounds like the right approach. I would have to see your detailed calculations to be sure.
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
  • #10
Guillem_dlc said:
Right. With sine and cosine, right? And I find the angle with the point. Then I multiply the result I have by these and it will give me the two axes, won't it?
It's simpler to use the unit vector ##\hat r = \frac{1}{5}(0, 3, 4)##.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top