Calculating Electric Field at Point P(0,0'03,0'04)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric field at point P(0, 0.03, 0.04) is calculated by combining the contributions from a charged sphere and an infinite plane. The electric field due to the plane, Eσ, is 11299.44 V/m, while the electric field due to the sphere, E0, is 18832.39 V/m, resulting in a total electric field ET of 30131.83 V/m. It is confirmed that the two electric fields do not point in the same direction, as Eσ is vertical while E0 has both vertical and horizontal components. To resolve E0 into its components, the use of sine and cosine functions along with a vector diagram is recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and their vector nature
  • Familiarity with the concepts of charge density and permittivity (ε0)
  • Knowledge of trigonometry, specifically sine and cosine functions
  • Ability to interpret vector diagrams for electric field components
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate electric field components using unit vectors
  • Study the principles of superposition in electric fields
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and their representation
  • Investigate the effects of different charge distributions on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone involved in the study of electromagnetism and electric field calculations.

Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
We have a sphere of radius ##R=6\, \textrm{cm}## charged with a volume density of charge ##\rho =10\, \mu \textrm{C}/\textrm{m}^3## centered at the origin of coordinates. An infinite plane located in the ##z=0##-plane will be charged with a surface charge density ##\sigma =0,2\, \mu \textrm{C}/\textrm{m}^2##. What is the modulus of the electric field at its point ##(0,3,4)\, \textrm{cm}?

Answer: ##2,87\cdot 10^4\, \textrmV}/\textrm{m}##
Relevant Equations
##E_\sigma=\dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}##
Captura de 2022-03-21 20-39-47.png

At point ##P(0,0'03,0'04)## the field caused by the sphere is added to the field caused by the plane.
First, ##E_\sigma##
$$E_\sigma=\dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}=\dfrac{0,2\cdot 10^{-6}}{2\varepsilon_0}=11299,44\, \textrm{V}/\textrm{m}$$
Then, ##E_0##: Because ##r<R##:
$$E_0=\dfrac{\rho}{3\varepsilon_0}r=\dfrac{10^{-6}\cdot 10}{3\varepsilon_0}$$
We see that ##r=|\vec{r}|=\sqrt{0,03^2+0,04^2}=0,05\, \textrm{m}## because ##\vec{r}=(0,0'03,0'04)-(0,0,0)=(0,0'03,0'04)##. Then,
$$E_0=\dfrac{10\cdot 10^{-6}}{3\varepsilon_0}\cdot 0,05=18832,39\, \textrm{V}/\textrm{m}$$
Finally,
$$E_T=E_\sigma +E_0=18832,39+11299,44=30131,83\, \textrm{V}/\textrm{m}$$

I don't get the solution I should give, should I have done modulus instead of direct summation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the two electric fields ##\vec E_0## and ##\vec E_{\sigma}## point in the same direction at the point (0, 3 cm, 4 cm)?
 
TSny said:
Do the two electric fields ##\vec E_0## and ##\vec E_{\sigma}## point in the same direction at the point (0, 3 cm, 4cm)?
No. ##\vec E_{\sigma}## is vertical, and the other has vertical and horizontal components, doesn't it?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
No. ##\vec E_{\sigma}## is vertical, and the other has vertical and horizontal components, doesn't it?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Guillem_dlc
TSny said:
Right.
But how do I separate the ##\vec E_0##? The formula is:
$$E_0=\dfrac{\rho}{3\varepsilon_0}r$$
 
Guillem_dlc said:
But how do I separate the ##\vec E_0##?
To find the components of ##\vec E_0## use your knowledge of the direction of ##\vec E_0##. A vector diagram can be helpful.
 
TSny said:
To find the components of ##\vec E_0## use your knowledge of the direction of ##\vec E_0##. A vector diagram can be helpful.
Right. With sine and cosine, right? And I find the angle with the point. Then I multiply the result I have by these and it will give me the two axes, won't it?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
Right. With sine and cosine, right? And I find the angle with the point. Then I multiply the result I have by these and it will give me the two axes, won't it?
That sounds like the right approach. I would have to see your detailed calculations to be sure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Guillem_dlc
  • #10
Guillem_dlc said:
Right. With sine and cosine, right? And I find the angle with the point. Then I multiply the result I have by these and it will give me the two axes, won't it?
It's simpler to use the unit vector ##\hat r = \frac{1}{5}(0, 3, 4)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K