Calculating Electric Field Due to Multiple Charged Balls

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the location of one charged ball (Q1) due to another charged ball (Q2) in a system involving three charged balls: one negative and two positive. The participants are exploring the application of Coulomb's law and the correct formulation for the electric field.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula used for calculating the electric field and question the application of Coulomb's law. There is confusion regarding the use of constants and the correct representation of the electric field.

Discussion Status

Some participants are clarifying the distinction between the electric field and the force, while others are questioning the use of certain constants in their calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to the problem, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that their class has not utilized Coulomb's constant in their discussions, which may contribute to the confusion regarding the calculations. There is also a reference to a specific figure that is not provided in the thread.

cowmoo32
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


13-46.jpg

At a particular moment, three small charged balls, one negative and two positive,are located as shown in Figure 13.46. Q1 = 3 nC, Q2 = 7 nC, and Q3 = -6 nC.

What is the electric field at the location of Q1, due to Q2?


Homework Equations


[tex]\vec E = q1q2\hat{r} / 4\pi\varepsilon r^2[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



r = <0, .04, 0> m
rmag = .04
rhat = <0, 1, 0>

E = [3e-9(7e-9)(9e9)] / .0016

Which gives me:

E = <0, 1.18125e-4, 0>

What am I doing wrong here? At first I figured I missed a negative, so I tried making my answer negative, but apparently that's not the case.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cowmoo32 said:
[tex]\vec E = q1q2\hat{r} / 4\pi\varepsilon r^2[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



r = <0, .04, 0> m
rmag = .04
rhat = <0, 1, 0>

E = [3e-9(7e-9)(9e9)] / .0016

Which gives me:

E = <0, 1.18125e-4, 0>

What am I doing wrong here? At first I figured I missed a negative, so I tried making my answer negative, but apparently that's not the case.

Isn't the electric field at Q1 due to Q2 given by
E = kQ/r2 = kQ2/(.04)2 ?
 
The way we've been doing it in class is the way I posted. We haven't even used k...what does it represent?
 
cowmoo32 said:
[tex]\vec E = q1q2\hat{r} / 4\pi\varepsilon r^2[/tex]

Hi cowmoo32! :smile:

No, that's Coulomb's law for the force

the field is just [tex]q2\hat{r} / 4\pi\varepsilon r^2[/tex] :smile:

(I think LowlyPion is saying the same thing, and his k is your [itex]1/ 4\pi\varepsilon[/itex])
 
cowmoo32 said:
The way we've been doing it in class is the way I posted. We haven't even used k...what does it represent?

k is Coulomb's constant

[tex]k = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}[/tex]

Edit: Tiny-Tim beat me to it.
 
I wrote it as k because Tex is more awkward to pound out.

Sorry if I confused you.
 
Thanks for the help, guys.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K