Calculating Electric Field Strength at a Specific Point on the x-axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter WINSTEW
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Field
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field strength from a given electric potential function along the x-axis, specifically V = 50x - (100/x). Participants are exploring the relationship between electric potential and electric field, particularly focusing on the differentiation process required to find E_x at a specified point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to take the partial derivative of the electric potential with respect to x to find the electric field. There are attempts to differentiate the function, with some participants expressing confusion over the signs and the correct application of differentiation rules.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the differentiation process, with some participants providing guidance on using the chain rule and clarifying the relationship between potential and electric field. Multiple interpretations of the differentiation steps are being discussed, and participants are encouraged to share their calculations for further feedback.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can receive. There is also a noted confusion regarding the correct formulation of the potential function and its derivatives.

WINSTEW
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The electric potential along the x-axis is V = 50x - (100/x)V, where x is in meters. What is E_x at x = 1.0m

Homework Equations


partial derivative of dV/dx, then plug in the value for x


The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the concept of trying to solve the equation you have to take the partial derivative of the equation with respect to x, when I do that I get 1-100(x), which is were I think I am going wrong.
Der 50x would just be 1
Der 100/x =100x^-1 = -100x

so when I put x=1 in for the equation and solve I do not get the right answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
V = 50x - (100/x)
= 50x -100*x^-1
dv/dx = 50 - 100(-1)x^-2
 
so when i solve for x=1 i get 150. I put that answer in and it still says its wrong but to check my signs.
I changed it to -150 and its correct... am i missing something?
 
nevermind its -dv/dx which would give the -150 answer thanks...

Finished that problem and now i have to do another one involving an x and a y component. Obviously you have to break the thing down into x and y but again I'm struggling on the partial derivative part.

350/(sqrt (x^2 + y^2))
 
I missed it, too. The formula is E = - dV/dx.
 
so the problem is now I don't know how to partial derive the function.
350/ ( (x^2 + y^2)^-.5)
 
Looks kind of odd - are you sure you have keyed in that expression correctly?
The way it stands, it simplifies to
f = 350*(x^2 + y^2)^0.5
To differentiate that with respect to x, you would use
u = x^2 + y^2 so f = 350*u^0.5
and the chain rule: df/dx = df/du*du/dx
In the details of that, you'll need the power rule a couple of times:
d/dx of x^n = nx^(n-1)
Give it a try!
 
yea the equation 350/sqrt (x^2 +y^2) is given as what voltage equals and x and y are in meters. It then asks what the strength of the electric field is at x=2 and y = 2.7. I have to partially derive the equation. Once for x and once for y. Put the values in and solve for each component. I just can't get the derivation right.
 
First you gave 350/ ( (x^2 + y^2)^-.5)
Then you gave 350/sqrt (x^2 +y^2)
These are not the same. The square root of u is the same as u^0.5 with no minus sign.
For V = 350/sqrt (x^2 +y^2) you would use the same idea
Let u = (x^2 +y^2) so that V = 350/u^0.5 = 350*u^-0.5
dV/dx = dV/du*du/dx
Do have a go at it and show your work so we can advise you further!
 
  • #10
ok so dV/dx = dV/du * du/dx
dV = .5*350u^-.5 = 175u^-.5
du = 2x + 2y

175u^-.5/2x+2y * 2x+2y/2

=175u^-.5/2

for the x partial derivative and
175u^-.5/2 for the y partial

doesn't look right
 
  • #11
The derivative of y = x^n is dy/dx = n*x^(n-1).
If you had y = x^3, then dy/dx would be 3*x^2.

V = 350*u^-0.5 has an "n" value of -0.5 so
dV/du = 350*(-0.5)*u^(-1.5)When differentiating u = x² + y², partially with respect to x, you take y to be a constant. So y² is also a constant and its derivative is zero.
∂u/∂x = 2x.
It doesn't make sense to write du alone; derivatives are always a ratio of two infinitesimally small differentials like du/dx. Since we are doing partial derivatives, we really should write ∂u/∂x. You can copy symbols like that from
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=347 .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
that symbol thing helps;
so

dV/du = -175*u^(-1.5)
now understanding that its a ∂u/∂x with respect to x; =2x and with respect to y; =2y

but how to i complete the equation to get an equation
-175*x^(1.5)/2x and -175*y^(1.5)/2y for the x and y directions respectively?
 
  • #13
∂V/∂x = ∂V/∂u*∂u/∂x
= -175*u^(-1.5)*2x
 
  • #14
I am lost again...

Do i just put the u value ( x^2 +y^2) back in the equation and solve for x and then do the same thing but with ∂u/∂y for y?

my x and y values were 2.0 and 2.7 respectively.
 
  • #15
u = x² + y² = 2² + 2.7² = 11.24

∂V/∂x = -175*u^(-1.5)*2x = -175*11.24^(-1.5)*2*2 = -18.5
 
  • #16
yea I'm not getting that answer to work for the Efield at point (2,2.7)
 
  • #17
Oh, did you remember the minus sign in Ex = -∂V/∂x this time?
Also, how are you combining Ex and Ey?
"It then asks what the strength of the electric field is at x=2 and y = 2.7."
suggests the answer is a single number for the E field, not separate Ex and Ey.
If you lay out the whole calc here, I'm sure someone will check it out for you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K