Calculating Electric Flux Through Cube's Left Face

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric flux through the left face of a cube in a uniform electric field. The cube has a side length of 2.0 m and is centered at the origin, with the electric field components provided in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of electric flux using the formula involving the dot product of the electric field and the area vector. There are questions about the correctness of the units for electric flux and whether the total flux through the cube should sum to zero.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the units of electric flux and the implications of Gauss' Law. There is an ongoing exploration of the signs in the calculations and whether the assumptions about the electric field being constant within the cube are valid.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not explicitly ask for the total flux, yet there is a discussion about whether it should equal zero due to the absence of charge within the cube.

tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
A cube of side L=2.0 m is centered at the origin, with the coordinate axes perpendicular to its faces. Find the flux of the electric field [tex]\overrightarrow E = \left( {15{\rm{ N/C}}} \right){\rm{\hat i + }}\left( {{\rm{27 N/C}}} \right){\rm{\hat j + }}\left( {{\rm{39 N/C}}} \right){\rm{\hat k}}[/tex] through each face of the cube.

Let's just concentrate on the cube's left face. From class notes [tex]\Phi _{{\rm{left}}} = \left\langle {\overrightarrow E \cdot {\rm{\hat n}}} \right\rangle {\rm{ Area}}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> \Phi _{{\rm{left}}} = \left\langle {\overrightarrow E \cdot {\rm{\hat n}}} \right\rangle {\rm{ Area = }}\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}} \cdot 1} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{27 N/C}} \cdot 0} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{39 N/C}} \cdot 0} \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 {\rm{ = }}\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}}} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 = \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \left( {15{\rm{ N/C}}} \right)4{\rm{m}}^2 = 60{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} /{\rm{C}} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

But the units are wrong. Shouldn't they be C/m2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't they be C/m2 ?
This quantity defines surface charge density, not the flux.
 
Integrated flux is N*m^2/C, right. Gauss' Law says integrated flux*epsilon_0=Q. The units of epsilon_0 are C^2/(N*m^2). So Q comes out to be coulombs. Everything looks ok to me.
 
Thanks. I'm glad I got the units right then.
Can someone look over this and tell me if I did it right? Did I get the signs right? It's the first time I've done this type of problem, and the answer isn't in the back of the book.

Although it didn't ask for total flux, should this add to 0?

Thanks!
[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> {\rm{\hat n}}_{{\rm{right}}} {\rm{ = \hat i}} \\ <br /> {\rm{\hat n}}_{{\rm{left}}} {\rm{ = }} - {\rm{\hat i}} \\ <br /> {\rm{\hat n}}_{{\rm{top}}} {\rm{ = \hat k}} \\ <br /> {\rm{\hat n}}_{{\rm{bottom}}} {\rm{ = }} - {\rm{\hat k}} \\ <br /> {\rm{\hat n}}_{{\rm{back}}} {\rm{ = \hat j}} \\ <br /> {\rm{\hat n}}_{{\rm{front}}} {\rm{ = }} - {\rm{\hat j}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> \Phi _{{\rm{left}}} = \left\langle {\overrightarrow E \cdot {\rm{\hat n}}} \right\rangle {\rm{ Area = }}\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}} \cdot 1} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{27 N/C}} \cdot 0} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{39 N/C}} \cdot 0} \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 {\rm{ = }}\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}}} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \,\,\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}}} \right)4{\rm{m}}^2 = - 60\,{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} /{\rm{C}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{right}}} = \, - \Phi _{{\rm{left}}} = 60\,{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} {\rm{/C}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{top}}} = \left\langle {\overrightarrow E \cdot {\rm{\hat n}}} \right\rangle {\rm{ Area = }}\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}} \cdot 0} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{27 N/C}} \cdot 0} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{39 N/C}} \cdot 1} \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 {\rm{ = }}\left( {39{\rm{ N/C}}} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \,\,\left( {39{\rm{ N/C}}} \right)4{\rm{m}}^2 = 156\,{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} /{\rm{C}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{bottom}}} = - \Phi _{{\rm{top}}} = - 156\,{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} /{\rm{C}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{front}}} = \left\langle {\overrightarrow E \cdot {\rm{\hat n}}} \right\rangle {\rm{ Area = }}\left( {15{\rm{ N/C}} \cdot 0} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{27 N/C}} \cdot - {\rm{\hat j}}} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( {{\rm{39 N/C}} \cdot 0} \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 {\rm{ = }}\left( {27{\rm{ N/C}}} \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right){\rm{ + }}\left( 0 \right)\left( {2{\rm{m}}} \right)^2 \\ <br /> \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, = \,\,\left( {27{\rm{ N/C}}} \right)4{\rm{m}}^2 = - 108\,{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} /{\rm{C}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{back}}} = - \Phi _{{\rm{front}}} = 108\,{\rm{Nm}}^{\rm{2}} /{\rm{C}} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]
 
Sure it adds to zero. There is no charge in the cube. Otherwise the E field wouldn't be constant. Right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
170
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K