Calculating EMF Using Kirchhoff's Rules

  • Thread starter Thread starter PirateFan308
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electromotive force (emf) ε required for a current of 1.75A to flow through a 7.00 ohm resistor using Kirchhoff's Rules. The user derived two equations based on the junction and loop rules, leading to calculated values of ε as 16.59V and 16.58V. Despite these calculations, the user reported that the answers were incorrect and sought assistance in identifying potential errors in their approach. The key equations utilized include Kirchhoff's junction rule and loop rule, along with Ohm's Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Rules, specifically the junction and loop rules.
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law and its application in circuit analysis.
  • Basic knowledge of electrical circuits and components, including resistors and emf sources.
  • Ability to solve linear equations derived from circuit analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of Kirchhoff's Junction Rule in complex circuits.
  • Study the derivation and implications of Kirchhoff's Loop Rule in circuit analysis.
  • Practice solving circuit problems involving multiple loops and junctions.
  • Explore common mistakes in circuit analysis and how to avoid them.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in circuit design and analysis who seeks to deepen their understanding of Kirchhoff's Rules and emf calculations.

PirateFan308
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What must the emf ε in the figure be in order for the current through the 7.00 ohm resistor to be 1.75A? Each emf source has negligible internal resistance.


Homework Equations


Kirchhoff's Rule:
\sum I=0 junction rule

\sum V=0 loop rule

The Attempt at a Solution


I have drawn my current directions as shown in the attachment below.

By the junction rule, I know that I_2 = I_3+I_1 and it is given that I_2=1.75A.

I drew a loop clockwise around the entire thing and came up with the following equation:

24V-(7 ohm)(1.75A)-(I_1)(3 ohm) = 0

so that I have

I_1 = (24V-12.25V)/3= 3.92A

and then

I_3 = I_2 - I_1 = 2.17

Drawing loop 2 clockwise within the right inner loop I have the following equation:

-(7 ohm)(I_2) - (I_3)(2 ohm) + ε = 0

solving for ε, I get

ε = (12.25V)+(4.34V) = 16.59V

Also, if I draw a clockwise loop inside the right inner loop, I have the following equation:

-ε + (I_3)(2 ohm) - (I_1)(3 ohm) + 24 V = 0

which simplifies to

ε = 16.58V

I can find no mistakes (and I have checked over my work a few times) but it is the wrong answer. Could anyone please help me? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • YF-26-62.jpg
    YF-26-62.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 1,984
Physics news on Phys.org
PirateFan308 said:

Homework Statement


What must the emf ε in the figure be in order for the current through the 7.00 ohm resistor to be 1.75A? Each emf source has negligible internal resistance.

Homework Equations


Kirchhoff's Rule:
\sum I=0 junction rule

\sum V=0 loop rule

The Attempt at a Solution


I have drawn my current directions as shown in the attachment below.

By the junction rule, I know that I_2 = I_3+I_1 and it is given that I_2=1.75A.

I drew a loop clockwise around the entire thing and came up with the following equation:

24V-(7 ohm)(1.75A)-(I_1)(3 ohm) = 0

so that I have

I_1 = (24V-12.25V)/3= 3.92A

and then

I_3 = I_2 - I_1 = 2.17
That should be I_3 = I_2 - I_1 = -2.17\text{A}
Drawing loop 2 clockwise within the right inner loop I have the following equation:

-(7 ohm)(I_2) - (I_3)(2 ohm) + ε = 0

solving for ε, I get

ε = (12.25V)+(4.34V) = 16.59V

Also, if I draw a clockwise loop inside the right inner loop, I have the following equation:

-ε + (I_3)(2 ohm) - (I_1)(3 ohm) + 24 V = 0

which simplifies to

ε = 16.58V

I can find no mistakes (and I have checked over my work a few times) but it is the wrong answer. Could anyone please help me? Thanks!
 
Thank you soo much! I can't believe I missed that - I was freaking out thinking I had the completely wrong idea. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
7K