Norton equivalen circuit problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter terryds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the Norton equivalent circuit, specifically involving mesh analysis and the application of Norton’s theorem. Participants are examining the relationships between currents and voltages in a circuit with multiple meshes.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of mesh equations and question the labeling of currents in the original poster's analysis. There is a focus on the inclusion of voltage drops and the implications of obtaining zero current in one mesh.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original equations and suggested revisiting the mesh analysis. There is acknowledgment of the possibility of zero current in certain configurations, but also skepticism regarding its validity in this specific case. Guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of open circuit voltages and the relationship between Norton and Thevenin equivalents.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly applying mesh analysis and the potential for confusion between Norton and Thevenin equivalents. There are references to external resources for clarification, and the discussion reflects varying levels of expertise among participants.

terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


11w7k9h.png


Determine the norton equivalent Circuit

Homework Equations


Norton theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I transform 5A and 10 ohm (in parallel) into 50 V and 10 ohm in series

vzesmx.png

So, there are three meshes,
for Mesh 1 (I assume the current is clockwise)

##30 i_1 - 10 i_2 = -20##

for Mesh 2

##40 i_2 - 20 i_3 = 50##

for Mesh 3

##40 i_3 - 20 i_2 = 20##Solving those three equations, I get ##i_1 = 0 A##, ##i_2 = 2 A##, ##i_3 = 1.5 A##

So, I_norton is i1 + i2 - i3 = 0 + 2 - 1.5 = 0.5 A

But, this is wrong answer. Please tell me where I got this wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I cannot figure out where you got the equations for the Mesh Analysis. Where are your loops? Which is i1 i2 and i3? Can you label your picture? Getting zero for one of the currents is possible in some circuits, but I don't think this is one of them (I haven't actually gone through the analysis, but just from looking at the voltages, it doesn't look likely). You may want to revisit the steps for Mesh Analysis. Here are a couple of sources that may help. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_analysis
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electri...pring-2006/lecture-notes/nodal_mesh_methd.pdf
 
terryds said:
40i2−20i3=5040i2−20i3=5040 i_2 - 20 i_3 = 50
You didn't include the voltage drop due to i1 in this equation. Other two equations look fine.
 
So I went through your calculations, and yes as @cnh1995 pointed out, you did not include the -10*i1 in Mesh 2. But I worked it out, and I arrived at i1 = zero Amperes (imagine that!).

So you can get the Open circuit voltage at A, and Open Circuit voltage at B. Find the difference between these for Δvab. So to get the Norton current, you need to short terminals A and B together, then run the calculations to find the current from A to B. The Norton Resistance is (Δvab) / (Short Ckt Current from A to B).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cnh1995
terryds said:
transform 5A and 10 ohm (in parallel) into 50 V and 10 ohm in series
I am no expert in this area, but I always understood that ammeters have negligible resistance. The 5A is the current not flowing through the 10 Ohm resistor, no?
 
haruspex said:
I am no expert in this area, but I always understood that ammeters have negligible resistance. The 5A is the current not flowing through the 10 Ohm resistor, no?
It is a 5Amp ideal current source. What @terryds did was replace a Norton circuit with a Thevenin Equivalent, which is a valid step in analysis. They behave the same.
 
scottdave said:
It is a 5Amp ideal current source. What @terryds did was replace a Norton circuit with a Thevenin Equivalent, which is a valid step in analysis. They behave the same.
Ok, thanks for the explanation.
 
scottdave said:
But I worked it out, and I arrived at i1 = zero Amperes (imagine that!).
Yes, I got the same result.
scottdave said:
So you can get the Open circuit voltage at A, and Open Circuit voltage at B. Find the difference between these for Δvab. So to get the Norton current, you need to short terminals A and B together, then run the calculations to find the current from A to B. The Norton Resistance is (Δvab) / (Short Ckt Current from A to B).
Another way to solve the problem is to find the Thevenin equivalent first (where ΔVab would be the Thevenin voltage), and convert it into Norton equivalent using source transformation.
(The resistors are connected in a special way, such that it is possible to find the Norton/Thevenin equivalent resistance only by visual inspection.)
 
Thanks @cnh1995 . Source Transformation was the term, which I couldn't think of.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K