Calculating Energy and Momentum in Different Frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the energy and momentum of a particle with rest mass m_0 moving in different reference frames using special relativity principles. In the S-frame, the energy E is calculated as E = 2m_0c^2 and momentum p as p = (m_0c, m_0c, m_0c). In the S'-frame, moving at v = (c/2, 0, 0), the transformed energy E' is derived as E' = √3 m_0c^2 and the momentum p' is (0, m_0c, m_0c). The confusion arises from the application of Lorentz transformations and the correct use of the relativistic velocity addition formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, including Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with the equations for energy E = γm_0c^2 and momentum p = γmu
  • Knowledge of the relativistic velocity addition formula
  • Basic understanding of vector norms in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Learn about the relativistic velocity addition formula in detail
  • Explore examples of energy and momentum transformations in different inertial frames
  • Review the concept of four-momentum in special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying special relativity, as well as professionals in fields requiring an understanding of relativistic mechanics.

PirateFan308
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of rest mass m_0 is moving the S-frame at a velocity of u=(c/2, c/2, c/2). Calculate:

a) its energy E and its momentum p in the S-frame

b) E' and p' in the S'-frame moving at v=(c/2, 0,0) relative to S

Homework Equations



v_x = \frac{v_x-u}{\sqrt{1-(v_xu)/c^2}}

E= \gamma m_0 c^2

p = \gamma m_0 u

The Attempt at a Solution


I was given the solutions, I just have difficulties understanding. The solution to part a) is fairly simple, simply calculating \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(u/c)^2}} where (u/c)^2 = 3/4. Then E= \gamma m_0 c^2 = 2m_0c^2 and p = \gamma m_0 u = 2m_0(c/2, c/2, c/2) = (m_0c, m_0c, m_0c)It's part b) that's giving me problems. The solution given is as follows:

LT for E and p. \gamma(v) = \frac{1}{(1-1/4)^{1/2}} = 2/ \sqrt{3}. E' = \gamma (v) (E-vp_x) = (2/ \sqrt{3})(2-1/2)m_0c^2 = \sqrt{3}m_0c^2

p_x' = \gamma(v)(p_x - vE/c^2) = 2/ \sqrt{3} (m_0c - c/2*2m_0) = 0. So then since p_y'=p_y=m_0c and p_z'=p_z=m_0c, we get p' = (0, m_0c, m_0c).The following is how I thought the question should be solved.

Note that v_x' = 0, v_y' = c/2, v_z' = c/2 so that u = (0, c/2, c/2). Then we would find \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(u^2/c^2)}} where u^2 = (c/2)^2+(c/2)^2 = 1/2c^2 so that \gamma = \sqrt{2}.

Then using we find that E= \gamma m_0 c^2 = \sqrt{2} m_0 c^2.

We also get p = \gamma m_0 u = \sqrt{2} m_0 (0, c/2, c/2) = (0, m_0c/\sqrt{2}, m_0c/ \sqrt{2}).I understand the logic of the given solution for momentum, but I don't understand where I made the mistake in my solution. Also, does anyone know how the two equations for relative energy and momentum were derived? I hadn't seen these two equations before I looked at the solutions.

I'm completely at a loss for the given solution for energy ... I'm confused why exactly we used \gamma (v), when shouldn't we generally use the relative velocity of the particle with respect to that particular frame (so take v=(0,c/2,c/2) with respect to the S'-frame)??

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just add velocities to transform between reference frames. Velocities don't add that way in special relativity. So it's NOT true that u' = u - v.

In more detail: it looks like you tried to used the Galilean rule for the addition of velocities (which is wrong and only holds approximately true at low speeds), when you should use the special relativistic rule. Check it out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula

EDIT: It appears that you are familiar with the correct special relativistic formula for the addition of velocities, since you posted it in your Relevant Equations! So I find it puzzling that you would make this mistake.
 
Hmm, I'm not quite sure where you believe I added velocities. I used Lorentz transformations to find that v_x'=0, v_y=c/2, v_z=c/2. Where v_x' = \frac{v_x-u}{1-\frac{uv_x}{c^2}} = \frac{c/2-c/2}{1-\frac{(c/2)(c/2)}{c^2}} = 0 and v_y' = v_z = \frac{v_y-u}{1-\frac{uv_x}{c^2}} = \frac{c/2-0}{1-\frac{(0)(c/2)}{c^2}} = c/2. It just occurred to me now that instead of using u=(u_x,u_y,u_z), should I instead use u=||u||?

For the u^2=(c/2)^2+(c/2)^2, I was attempting to find the norm of u = \sqrt{u_x^2+u_y^2+u_z^2} where each u_x, u_y, and u_z were all in the same frame (S'-frame).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K