Calculating Energy Levels for Lattice Using Analytic Continuation?

trogvar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
When energy levels for a lattice are constructed the Bloch wave vector is evaluated along the edges of the irruducible zone. Like \Gamma - X - M path for a square lattice.

I wonder why the calculation is NOT performed for values within the zone? And how the energy corresponding to an arbitrary vector within the zone but not laying at the boundary can be obtained from a band-gap diagrams (plotted for example in \Gamma - X - M coordinates)

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're quite free to plot the band structure along any path you like. Much of the time we're only concerned about the behavior at the min and max of the bands, which only requires plotting in a few directions. You might want to know the band gaps, effective masses, and anisotropies near theses extrema. If, for some reason, you're especially concerned about what's happening off the band path, you'll just have to do a calculation of that system yourself (or call authors). Incidentally, there is a theorem that says it's possible to reconstruct the band structure from the band eigenvalues only at the gamma point. From k.p theory I think. You can look it up.
 
Thank you!

That's quite interesting that we can reconstruct the band structure from only information at \Gamma

Still people plot the diagrams in the particular paths along irreducible zones. You say

sam_bell said:
Much of the time we're only concerned about the behavior at the min and max of the bands, which only requires plotting in a few directions.

Why these are more important?

Thanks again
 
trogvar said:
Why these are more important?

These give you the most elementary information about the material such as whether it is a metal, semiconductor or insulator (determined by band gap, which is the energy difference between the maximum of the valence band and the minimum of the conduction band) and whether it has a direct or indirect gap (determined by whether the minimum and maximum occur at the same k-point). This is what the band structure is mainly used for. If calculated using the density-functional theory (usually the case) it would be risky trying to determine more subtle effects from the band structure due to the inaccuracies of the method.
 
trogvar said:
When energy levels for a lattice are constructed the Bloch wave vector is evaluated along the edges of the irruducible zone. Like \Gamma - X - M path for a square lattice.

I wonder why the calculation is NOT performed for values within the zone?
The \Gamma-point is at the zone center, and the \Gamma-X line, for instance, does span a region of reciprocal space "within the zone".
 
trogvar said:
That's quite interesting that we can reconstruct the band structure from only information at \Gamma

The technique is called analytic continuation, and it only works if you have a large number of wave functions at the center of zone. You get a decent approximation if you have 16 or more wave functions and all the coupling constants between them.
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top