Calculating Equations of Satellite Motion for Scientists

AI Thread Summary
Calculating equations of satellite motion involves understanding the principles of orbital mechanics, including gravitational forces and velocity. Participants suggest using online resources for foundational knowledge and references. Clarifications on the original question indicate some confusion among contributors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of thorough research before seeking specific guidance. Engaging with existing literature can enhance understanding of satellite motion calculations.
bryan goh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
how to calculate equations of satellite motion because I just thought to make it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bryan goh said:
how to calculate equations of satellite motion because I just thought to make it
Google is your friend! :smile:
 
To make a satellite?
 
DrSteve said:
To make a satellite?

that wasn't your original Q,

As berkeman suggested, google your Q then come back with references to anything you didn't understand
and see if some one can guide your through :smile:
 
davenn said:
that wasn't your original Q,

I think you have your OP confused...
 
glappkaeft said:
I think you have your OP confused...
No big deal. That never happens to me, though... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Satellite mechanics: linear and rotational momentum
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Newton's Second Law - variable mass case
Replies
14
Views
2K
Orbital Slingshot and Conservation of Momentum Confusion
Replies
9
Views
7K
Orbital Mechanics Vis Viva Equation Question
Replies
1
Views
2K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Why is the speed of orbiting satellites constant?
Replies
16
Views
4K
Atmospheric drag on an artificial satellite orbiting the Earth
Replies
4
Views
2K
Orbital Mechanics: Find Eqns of Motion w/ Initial Conditions
Replies
3
Views
1K
How do GPS Satellites work exactly?
Replies
5
Views
2K
How to get tangential velocity
Replies
28
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top