Calculating F, V and C: Why Can It Not Be Obtained This Way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hidemi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the incorrect approach to calculating force, velocity, and potential energy in a specific problem. The error lies in treating acceleration as the derivative of velocity with respect to position instead of time, leading to an incorrect expression for velocity. The correct method involves recognizing that acceleration is the time derivative of velocity and requires solving a differential equation using separation of variables. Additionally, a different notation for derivatives can clarify the relationships between acceleration, velocity, and position. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying calculus principles to derive accurate physical equations.
hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
A 0.20-kg particle moves along the x axis under the influence of a conservative force. The potential energy is given by

U(x) = (8.0 J/m^2)x^2 + (2.0 J/m^4)x^4,

where x is in coordinate of the particle. If the particle has a speed of 5.0 m/s when it is at x = 1.0 m, its speed when it is at the origin is:

a) 0 m/s
b) 2.5 m/s
c) 5.7 m/s
d) 7.9 m/s
e) 11 m/s

The answer is E.
Relevant Equations
K1 + U1 = K2 + U2
The correct answer can be obtained by the calculation as attached.
12.png

However it can not be gotten by the following way. Why?
F = -∇U = -[ 16x + 8x^3] = ma
Since m = 0.2, a = -80x - 40x^3
V = -40x^2 - 10x^4 +C =5
c= 50 + 5 =55
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have treated acceleration as if it were the derivative of velocity with respect to position when it is the derivative of velocity with respect to time.
 
Your mistake is that the velocity is the integral of acceleration with respect to time t , not with respect to the distance or x-coordinate. So your line

hidemi said:
V=-40x^2-10x^4+C
is wrong. To continue with your way, you should set ##a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}v## and solve the ODE $$-16x-8x^3=m\frac{dv}{dx}v$$ by the separating variables technique.
 
Delta2 said:
Your mistake is that the velocity is the integral of acceleration with respect to time t , not with respect to the distance or x-coordinate. So your lineis wrong. To continue with your way, you should set ##a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}v## and solve the ODE $$-16x-8x^3=m\frac{dv}{dx}v$$ by the separating variables technique.
Thanks for your remider :)
 
Similar technique, but slightly different on execution is to let a dot denote derivative with respect to time, i.e., ##a = \ddot x## and ##v = \dot x##. The equation of motion becomes
$$
\ddot x = -80x - 40 x^3.
$$
Multiplying both sides with ##v = \dot x## leads to
$$
v \dot v = \ddot x \dot x = -80 x \dot x - 40 x^3 \dot x.
$$
Noting that for any function ##g(t)##, it holds that ##d(g^n)/dt = n g^{n-1} \dot g## therefore leads to
$$
\frac{d}{dt} \left[\frac 12 v^2\right] = \frac{d}{dt}\left[ - 40 x^2 - 10 x^4\right],
$$
which means the expressions being differentiated differ by a constant, which is essentially the conservation of energy equation.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top