Calculating F, V and C: Why Can It Not Be Obtained This Way?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hidemi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of force, velocity, and a constant in the context of classical mechanics, specifically involving the relationship between force, potential energy, and motion. Participants are examining the validity of certain mathematical manipulations related to these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the treatment of acceleration as a derivative with respect to position rather than time. There are discussions on the proper integration of acceleration to find velocity and the implications of using different variables in the equations of motion.

Discussion Status

Several participants have pointed out potential misunderstandings in the original poster's approach, specifically regarding the relationships between acceleration, velocity, and position. Alternative methods involving differential equations and conservation of energy principles have been suggested, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the correct treatment of derivatives and integrals in the context of motion, with some participants highlighting the need for clarity on the definitions and relationships between the variables involved. The original poster's assumptions and calculations are under scrutiny, prompting a reevaluation of their approach.

hidemi
Messages
206
Reaction score
36
Homework Statement
A 0.20-kg particle moves along the x axis under the influence of a conservative force. The potential energy is given by

U(x) = (8.0 J/m^2)x^2 + (2.0 J/m^4)x^4,

where x is in coordinate of the particle. If the particle has a speed of 5.0 m/s when it is at x = 1.0 m, its speed when it is at the origin is:

a) 0 m/s
b) 2.5 m/s
c) 5.7 m/s
d) 7.9 m/s
e) 11 m/s

The answer is E.
Relevant Equations
K1 + U1 = K2 + U2
The correct answer can be obtained by the calculation as attached.
12.png

However it can not be gotten by the following way. Why?
F = -∇U = -[ 16x + 8x^3] = ma
Since m = 0.2, a = -80x - 40x^3
V = -40x^2 - 10x^4 +C =5
c= 50 + 5 =55
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have treated acceleration as if it were the derivative of velocity with respect to position when it is the derivative of velocity with respect to time.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Your mistake is that the velocity is the integral of acceleration with respect to time t , not with respect to the distance or x-coordinate. So your line

hidemi said:
V=-40x^2-10x^4+C
is wrong. To continue with your way, you should set ##a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}v## and solve the ODE $$-16x-8x^3=m\frac{dv}{dx}v$$ by the separating variables technique.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hidemi
Delta2 said:
Your mistake is that the velocity is the integral of acceleration with respect to time t , not with respect to the distance or x-coordinate. So your lineis wrong. To continue with your way, you should set ##a=\frac{dv}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{dv}{dx}v## and solve the ODE $$-16x-8x^3=m\frac{dv}{dx}v$$ by the separating variables technique.
Thanks for your remider :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Similar technique, but slightly different on execution is to let a dot denote derivative with respect to time, i.e., ##a = \ddot x## and ##v = \dot x##. The equation of motion becomes
$$
\ddot x = -80x - 40 x^3.
$$
Multiplying both sides with ##v = \dot x## leads to
$$
v \dot v = \ddot x \dot x = -80 x \dot x - 40 x^3 \dot x.
$$
Noting that for any function ##g(t)##, it holds that ##d(g^n)/dt = n g^{n-1} \dot g## therefore leads to
$$
\frac{d}{dt} \left[\frac 12 v^2\right] = \frac{d}{dt}\left[ - 40 x^2 - 10 x^4\right],
$$
which means the expressions being differentiated differ by a constant, which is essentially the conservation of energy equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
774
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
690
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
918