Calculating Flux over the closed surface of a cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the flux over a closed surface of a cylinder using the Divergence Theorem. The user initially computes the surface integral and the volume integral, yielding different results: (2a² + b)bπ for the surface integral and 3πa²b for the volume integral. Key errors identified include neglecting the end caps of the cylinder and incorrectly incorporating the z-term in the surface integral. The correct approach requires considering both the mantle and the end caps to achieve a consistent result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Divergence Theorem
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically surface and volume integrals
  • Ability to perform dot products and cross products of vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Divergence Theorem and its applications in vector calculus
  • Study the calculation of flux integrals over closed surfaces
  • Learn about the parametric representation of cylindrical surfaces
  • Explore dimensional analysis in the context of vector fields and integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working on vector calculus problems, particularly those involving flux calculations over cylindrical surfaces.

HRubss
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the flux of [tex]\overrightarrow{V} = x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k}[/tex][tex]\int \overrightarrow{V} \cdot \hat{n} da [/tex] where the integral is to be taken over the closed surface of a cylinder [tex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2[/tex] which is bounded by the place z = 0 and z = b
Relevant Equations
[tex]\int \overrightarrow{V} \cdot \hat{n} da [/tex]
[tex]\int\int ( \overrightarrow{V}\cdot\hat{n} )dS = \int \int \int (\nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{V}) dV[/tex]
I wanted to check my answer because I'm getting two different answers with the use of the the Divergence theorem. For the left part of the equation, I converted it so that I can evaluate the integral in polar coordinates. \oint \oint (\overrightarrow{V}\cdot\hat{n}) dS = \oint \oint (\overrightarrow{V} \cdot\hat{n}) d\theta dz
x = acos\thetay = asin\theta \overrightarrow{V} = <acos\theta, asin\theta,z>and \hat{n} =\frac{\partial r}{\partial \theta} \times \frac{\partial r}{\partial z}

After applying the cross product and the dot product, I end up with this integral to evaluate. \int_{0}^{b}\int_{0}^{2\pi}(a^2cos^2\theta + a^2sin^2\theta + z )d\theta dz which gives me (2a^2+b)b\pi

When I do the right side of the equation, taking the divergence of V results in this integral. \int \int \int(3)dV and converting it to polar via dV = rdrdzd\theta results in \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{b}\int_{0}^{a}(3r)drdzd\theta I finally end up with 3\pi a^2b

Is my arithmetic off or am I doing something wrong? Thank you for any responses!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is ##r## in the definition of ##\hat{n}##? All integrals you calculated are correct, so the mistake did not happen there. I guess the mistake happens when you get to the expression of the first integral. Can't tell because you left out those calculations.

Note that $$\iiint 3dV = 3\iiint dV = 3 \mathrm{volume}(cylinder) = 3 \pi a^2b$$ so there you could have worked a little bit less ;).
 
You are forgetting the end-caps when doing the surface integral.

It is also not clear to me how you ended up with the ##z## in the integrand of the surface integral. The resulting term is quite clearly incorrect based on dimensional analysis.
 
Math_QED said:
What is ##r## in the definition of ##\hat{n}##? All integrals you calculated are correct, so the mistake did not happen there. I guess the mistake happens when you get to the expression of the first integral. Can't tell because you left out those calculations.

Note that $$\iiint 3dV = 3\iiint dV = 3 \mathrm{volume}(cylinder) = 3 \pi a^2b$$ so there you could have worked a little bit less ;).

Wow haha, this would've save me more time

Orodruin said:
You are forgetting the end-caps when doing the surface integral.

It is also not clear to me how you ended up with the ##z## in the integrand of the surface integral. The resulting term is quite clearly incorrect based on dimensional analysis.

My apologies, it should be \overrightarrow{r} = <acos\theta,bcos\theta , z> This is from the parametric description of a cylinder.
End caps? My calculus is a bit rusty, its been about 2 years since I've worked on vector calculus.
 
HRubss said:
This is from the parametric description of a cylinder.
No, that is just the mantle area of the cylinder. The cylinder surface also consists of two discs - the end caps. Without them you do not have a closed surface.

Edit: Also consider my comments about the z term.
 
Orodruin said:
No, that is just the mantle area of the cylinder. The cylinder surface also consists of two discs - the end caps. Without them you do not have a closed surface.

Oh! I see what you mean. Would I have to add two more flux bounded by a circle to the total flux?
 
HRubss said:
Oh! I see what you mean. Would I have to add two more flux bounded by a circle to the total flux?
Discs, not circles. Discs are two-dimensional, circles one-dimensional.

Also, see the comment anout the z-term.
 
Orodruin said:
Discs, not circles. Discs are two-dimensional, circles one-dimensional.

Also, see the comment anout the z-term.

For the mantel, the normal would be \hat{n} = \frac{<x,y,0>}{a} and for the disks, it would be \hat{n} = \frac{<0,0,z>}{b} From those two normal, I can take the dot product of normal with the vector and get the total flux? Sorry if I'm being slow...
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K