Calculating Force: Help from Applemush

  • Thread starter Applemush
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Force
In summary, the conversation centered around calculating the amount of force needed to move a 9.6g object at an average speed of 450 feet/second. The equation used was Force=Mass*Acceleration, but there was confusion about the units and the use of time in the equation. It was clarified that the equation should be V=at to find the final velocity, which can then be used in F=ma to find the force needed. It was also emphasized that all quantities must be in a consistent set of units for the calculation to be accurate.
  • #1
Applemush
5
0
I'm trying to calculate the amount of force I will need to move a 9.6g object at an average speed of 450 feet/ second. So when I do this I use Force=Mass*Acceleration. Since acceleration is change in speed/change in time (both of which are initially 0) I come out with 450*9.6. This yeilds 4320. Now, either I'm doing something terrible wrong, or I just have my units incorrect. I am not even sure what unit this answer is in, so if someone could explain this to me it would be amazing... Also this is my first time ever using the forum so if I have posted it in the wrong spot could you please redirect me.

-Sincerly,
Applemush
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You'll need to pay more attention to units because you are mixing English with Metric. The typical way to use the equation is using kilograms as the mass and meters per second as the acceleration, giving a force in Newtons.

So you could use .0096 kg and 137 m/s/s, getting 1.3 N. But what does that mean?

You've just calculated the force required to accelerate 9.6N to 137 m/s in 1s. But you didn't say anything about time. You could use 68.5 m/s/s for 2 seconds... So you've just discovered that there isn't anyone required force to accelerate an object if there is no friction involved. You can use any force you want. Any force will provide an acceleration.

And if there is friction involved, then the answer is slighty over the friction force and you'll need to calculate that via other means.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I have an extremely limitted knowledge of physics. Could you please explain more about the time...I don't understand. Thank you for explaining that I mixed systems of measurement, I knever knew that gram and feet were not in the same one. However I do not see why you divide the time by 2 if the time elapsed became 2..."You've just calculated the force required to accelerate 9.6N to 137 m/s in 1s. But you didn't say anything about time. You could use 68.5 m/s/s for 2 seconds..." Could you please explain this as well?
 
  • #4
Applemush said:
I have an extremely limitted knowledge of physics. Could you please explain more about the time...I don't understand. Thank you for explaining that I mixed systems of measurement, I knever knew that gram and feet were not in the same one.
The equation is f=ma. Force = mass times acceleration. There's nothing in there about speed or how long it takes to get up to accelerate to a certain speed.
However I do not see why you divide the time by 2 if the time elapsed became 2..."You've just calculated the force required to accelerate 9.6N to 137 m/s in 1s. But you didn't say anything about time. You could use 68.5 m/s/s for 2 seconds..." Could you please explain this as well?
That's just a random example to illustrate the point above. The point is that you can pick any acceleration you want. The equation relating acceleration and velocity is v=a*t. You want an average velocity of 450 ft/s. With constant acceleration, you'll then need a final speed of 900 ft/s. So plugging in 900=a*t, you can pick any acceleration or time you want and calculate the other.

Regarding units, when doing math, you do the math to the units just like you do fractions. Ie, for a*t=v --- m/s^2 * s = m/s. The only caveat is that a Newton is defined as kg-m/s^2.
 
  • #5
I'll get a word in edgeways:
Newton had just told us the force equals the change rate of the momentum,which writes:
F∝mv/t,Or F=kmv/t.
In Metric, k =1.However,you can make k≠1 in other measurement metrics.That's where the floor host's mistake is,I thought.
 
  • #6
F=ma is not the place you want to start from to do this sort of problem.

In a elementray Physics course you will be presented with a set of equations that must be memorized. It is one of these that you need to use.

V = at + V 0

Here V is the final velocity, a is the acceleration, t is time, and V 0 is the velocity at time =0.

If at time = 0 the velocity is 0 this becomes, simply:

V=at

Now since F=ma or a = F/m you can write:

[tex] V = \frac {Ft} m [/tex]

To find the force rearrange this to get:

[tex] F = \frac {Vm} t [/tex]

From this it is clear that given a final velocity and a mass you must also specify a time to arrive at a force.

Last but not least, to get a useful number all of the above quanities must be in a consistent set of units.
 

1. How do I calculate force using Applemush?

To calculate force using Applemush, you will need to input the mass and acceleration of the object into the formula F=ma. Applemush will then automatically calculate the force for you.

2. What is the unit of measurement for force in Applemush?

The unit of measurement for force in Applemush is Newtons (N).

3. Can Applemush calculate force for multiple objects?

Yes, Applemush has the capability to calculate force for multiple objects. Simply input the mass and acceleration for each object and Applemush will provide the total force.

4. Is Applemush accurate in its calculations?

Yes, Applemush is highly accurate in its calculations as it uses the standard formula F=ma to calculate force.

5. Can I use Applemush for non-physics related calculations?

No, Applemush is specifically designed for calculating force in physics-related scenarios. It is not recommended for other types of calculations.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
838
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
796
  • Classical Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
471
  • General Discussion
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
858
  • Classical Physics
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
Back
Top