Calculating Force: Help from Applemush

  • Thread starter Thread starter Applemush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating force using the formula F=ma, where F is force, m is mass, and a is acceleration. The user, Applemush, initially misapplied units by mixing metric and imperial systems, leading to confusion about the resulting force calculation. The correct approach involves using consistent units, such as kilograms for mass and meters per second squared for acceleration, yielding results in Newtons. Additionally, the discussion emphasizes the importance of specifying time to accurately determine force when calculating acceleration to a desired velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion (F=ma)
  • Knowledge of unit conversion between metric and imperial systems
  • Familiarity with basic kinematic equations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass, acceleration, and time
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about unit conversion methods between metric and imperial systems
  • Study kinematic equations, specifically V = at + V0
  • Explore the concept of force in relation to friction and acceleration
  • Investigate the implications of time in force calculations and motion
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of force calculation and unit consistency in physics problems.

Applemush
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate the amount of force I will need to move a 9.6g object at an average speed of 450 feet/ second. So when I do this I use Force=Mass*Acceleration. Since acceleration is change in speed/change in time (both of which are initially 0) I come out with 450*9.6. This yeilds 4320. Now, either I'm doing something terrible wrong, or I just have my units incorrect. I am not even sure what unit this answer is in, so if someone could explain this to me it would be amazing... Also this is my first time ever using the forum so if I have posted it in the wrong spot could you please redirect me.

-Sincerly,
Applemush
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to pay more attention to units because you are mixing English with Metric. The typical way to use the equation is using kilograms as the mass and meters per second as the acceleration, giving a force in Newtons.

So you could use .0096 kg and 137 m/s/s, getting 1.3 N. But what does that mean?

You've just calculated the force required to accelerate 9.6N to 137 m/s in 1s. But you didn't say anything about time. You could use 68.5 m/s/s for 2 seconds... So you've just discovered that there isn't anyone required force to accelerate an object if there is no friction involved. You can use any force you want. Any force will provide an acceleration.

And if there is friction involved, then the answer is slighty over the friction force and you'll need to calculate that via other means.
 
Last edited:
I have an extremely limitted knowledge of physics. Could you please explain more about the time...I don't understand. Thank you for explaining that I mixed systems of measurement, I knever knew that gram and feet were not in the same one. However I do not see why you divide the time by 2 if the time elapsed became 2..."You've just calculated the force required to accelerate 9.6N to 137 m/s in 1s. But you didn't say anything about time. You could use 68.5 m/s/s for 2 seconds..." Could you please explain this as well?
 
Applemush said:
I have an extremely limitted knowledge of physics. Could you please explain more about the time...I don't understand. Thank you for explaining that I mixed systems of measurement, I knever knew that gram and feet were not in the same one.
The equation is f=ma. Force = mass times acceleration. There's nothing in there about speed or how long it takes to get up to accelerate to a certain speed.
However I do not see why you divide the time by 2 if the time elapsed became 2..."You've just calculated the force required to accelerate 9.6N to 137 m/s in 1s. But you didn't say anything about time. You could use 68.5 m/s/s for 2 seconds..." Could you please explain this as well?
That's just a random example to illustrate the point above. The point is that you can pick any acceleration you want. The equation relating acceleration and velocity is v=a*t. You want an average velocity of 450 ft/s. With constant acceleration, you'll then need a final speed of 900 ft/s. So plugging in 900=a*t, you can pick any acceleration or time you want and calculate the other.

Regarding units, when doing math, you do the math to the units just like you do fractions. Ie, for a*t=v --- m/s^2 * s = m/s. The only caveat is that a Newton is defined as kg-m/s^2.
 
I'll get a word in edgeways:
Newton had just told us the force equals the change rate of the momentum,which writes:
F∝mv/t,Or F=kmv/t.
In Metric, k =1.However,you can make k≠1 in other measurement metrics.That's where the floor host's mistake is,I thought.
 
F=ma is not the place you want to start from to do this sort of problem.

In a elementray Physics course you will be presented with a set of equations that must be memorized. It is one of these that you need to use.

V = at + V 0

Here V is the final velocity, a is the acceleration, t is time, and V 0 is the velocity at time =0.

If at time = 0 the velocity is 0 this becomes, simply:

V=at

Now since F=ma or a = F/m you can write:

V = \frac {Ft} m

To find the force rearrange this to get:

F = \frac {Vm} t

From this it is clear that given a final velocity and a mass you must also specify a time to arrive at a force.

Last but not least, to get a useful number all of the above quanities must be in a consistent set of units.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
846
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K