Pendulum Tension Force -- How to calculate the full vector?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the tension force in a pendulum as a vector, particularly focusing on its components in both the x and y directions. Participants explore the application of Newton's second law and the dynamics of pendulum motion, including energy conservation and the effects of gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the tension force (T) was fully calculated, noting that only the y-component was considered, and seeks to find both x and y components of T.
  • Another participant states that at the vertical position of the pendulum, the horizontal component of tension is zero, leading to a net horizontal force of zero.
  • There is a discussion about the horizontal component of acceleration, with some participants asserting it should also be zero at the vertical position.
  • Participants propose that the magnitude of tension remains constant while its direction changes, suggesting a need to express T as a function of the angle θ(t).
  • One participant suggests drawing a free body diagram to calculate tension as a function of angle and velocity.
  • There is a request for clarification on how to approach the problem of finding tension as a vector, particularly in terms of its components along the rope and perpendicular to it.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the acceleration components and how to represent them in the context of the pendulum's motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to analyze the pendulum's motion using components and Newton's laws, but there is disagreement regarding the treatment of acceleration and the representation of tension as a vector. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on how to proceed with the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to resolve vectors into components and the importance of understanding the relationship between tension, angle, and velocity. There are references to specific equations and diagrams that may not be fully understood by all participants, indicating potential gaps in mathematical knowledge or assumptions about the pendulum's motion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and enthusiasts of physics, particularly those studying dynamics, pendulum motion, and vector analysis in mechanics.

  • #31
babaliaris said:
In other words, I had to add signs as well when writing the ΣF equations which I didn't do.
OK, then do it and write the correct equation for Newton's second law in the y (or r) direction. Be sure to have the correct expression for the acceleration in terms of the speed ##V##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: babaliaris
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I think I solved it. By the way, I wanted to find out θ(t).

1664136140041.jpg

1664136140034.jpg

1664136140027.jpg
 

Attachments

  • #33
babaliaris said:
I think I solved it. By the way, I wanted to find out θ(t).
I don't think you solved it correctly. The tension depends on the speed ##V##. Your expression for it does not. If you want to find θ(t), you have to solve the differential equation $$\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}+\frac{g}{L}\sin\theta =0.$$ You can only solve it approximately, e.g. use the small-angle approximation ##\sin\theta \approx \theta## which of course is invalid here because the pendulum starts at the horizontal position. However, you can find the angular speed as a function of angle, ##\omega(\theta).##
 
  • #34
Can anyone point out my mistake? Maybe the mistake is the way I describe acceleration, it's the only thing I'm not completely sure if it is correct.

Maybe the way that I said ##a_{T} = |a|cos(θ)## ##a_{Ν} = |a|sin(θ)## and then calculated ##|a|## from ##ΣF_{T}=ma_{T}## it's not correct.

And instead, maybe I should have written the ##ΣF_{N} = ma_{N} = m \frac{|V|^{2}}{L}## and use this one to find the tension.

But I would like to know what I did wrong.

I don't see any mistakes in my math, so it must be something in my "Physics way of thinking".
 
  • #35
babaliaris said:
And instead, maybe I should have written the ## ΣFN=maN=\frac{m|V|^2}{L}## and use this one to find the tension.
That’s exactly what you should have done and what I meant when I said relate the tension and the speed. What is that relation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #36
##T = m[\frac{|V(t)|^2}{L} + gcos(θ(t))]##

And If I'm correct, this is not a conservative force since it depends on the velocity which depends on time, so, if I was using the principle of conservation of mechanical energy (potential energy in highest point + kinetic energy in highest point = potential energy at the lowest point + kinetic energy at the lowest point) it would be wrong.
 
  • #37
babaliaris said:
##T = m[\frac{|V(t)|^2}{L} + gcos(θ(t))]##

And If I'm correct, this is not a conservative force since it depends on the velocity which depends on time, so, if I was using the principle of conservation of mechanical energy (potential energy in highest point + kinetic energy in highest point = potential energy at the lowest point + kinetic energy at the lowest point) it would be wrong.
It doesn't matter if the tension is conservative or not. It is always perpendicular to the path and ##dW=\mathbf{T}\cdot d\mathbf{s}=0##. This means that the tension does zero work on the mass. It changes the direction of the velocity ##\mathbf{V}## but not the speed ##V##. Use energy conservation to find an expression for ##mV^2## in terms of ##\theta## and put in the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: babaliaris
  • #38
It's easier with Lagrange I, i.e., you don't introduce the angle as a generalized parameter but work with (plane) Cartesian coordinates and imposing the constraint with a Lagrange parameter. The corresponding Lagrangian reads (setting ##\vec{x}=(x,y)##)
$$L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 -mg y +\frac{\lambda}{2} (\vec{x}^2-L^2).$$
The Euler-Lagrange equations read
$$m \ddot{x} = \lambda x, \quad m \ddot{y}=-mg + \lambda y.$$
From this it follows
$$\vec{T}=m \ddot{x}+m g \vec{e}_y = \lambda \vec{x}.$$
To get ##\lambda## note that
$$m x \ddot{x} + m (\ddot{y}+g) y = \lambda(x^2+y^2)=\lambda L^2 \; \Rightarrow \; \lambda = \frac{m(\vec{x} \cdot \ddot{\vec{x}}+g y)}{L^2}.$$
Now you introduce ##\theta## via ##\vec{x}=L(\sin \theta,-\cos \theta)##. Plugging this into the formula for ##\lambda## you find
$$\lambda=-\frac{m}{L} (L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
Thus
$$\vec{T}=-m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta) \begin{pmatrix}\sin \theta \\ -\cos \theta \end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$|\vec{T}|=m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
 
  • #39
kuruman said:
It doesn't matter if the tension is conservative or not. It is always perpendicular to the path and ##dW=\mathbf{T}\cdot d\mathbf{s}=0##. This means that the tension does zero work on the mass. It changes the direction of the velocity ##\mathbf{V}## but not the speed ##V##. Use energy conservation to find an expression for ##mV^2## in terms of ##\theta## and put in the equation.
I understand what you are saying, thanks for this note.

I'm not sure about the potential energy when the pendulum is at its maximum angle, because I don't know what the height is there. I saw on the internet people taking the height = L when the angle of the pendulum is 90 degrees but is this correct? I don't know if the pendulum can reach that high. Maybe it does not matter in terms of energy, since they could reach there if I calmy v(0) = 0 leaving it to fall while holding it at 90 degrees.
vanhees71 said:
It's easier with Lagrange I, i.e., you don't introduce the angle as a generalized parameter but work with (plane) Cartesian coordinates and imposing the constraint with a Lagrange parameter. The corresponding Lagrangian reads (setting ##\vec{x}=(x,y)##)
$$L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 -mg y +\frac{\lambda}{2} (\vec{x}^2-L^2).$$
The Euler-Lagrange equations read
$$m \ddot{x} = \lambda x, \quad m \ddot{y}=-mg + \lambda y.$$
From this it follows
$$\vec{T}=m \ddot{x}+m g \vec{e}_y = \lambda \vec{x}.$$
To get ##\lambda## note that
$$m x \ddot{x} + m (\ddot{y}+g) y = \lambda(x^2+y^2)=\lambda L^2 \; \Rightarrow \; \lambda = \frac{m(\vec{x} \cdot \ddot{\vec{x}}+g y)}{L^2}.$$
Now you introduce ##\theta## via ##\vec{x}=L(\sin \theta,-\cos \theta)##. Plugging this into the formula for ##\lambda## you find
$$\lambda=-\frac{m}{L} (L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
Thus
$$\vec{T}=-m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta) \begin{pmatrix}\sin \theta \\ -\cos \theta \end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$|\vec{T}|=m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
I don't understand this math :P
 
  • #40
babaliaris said:
I understand what you are saying, thanks for this note.

I'm not sure about the potential energy when the pendulum is at its maximum angle, because I don't know what the height is there. I saw on the internet people taking the height = L when the angle of the pendulum is 90 degrees but is this correct? I don't know if the pendulum can reach that high. Maybe it does not matter in terms of energy, since they could reach there if I calmy v(0) = 0 leaving it to fall while holding it at 90 degrees.

I don't understand this math :P
Gravitational potential energy near the surface of the Earth is ##U=mgy## where ##y## is the vertical distance from an origin of your choice to the point where you want to find the potential energy. If you choose the lowest point of the motion as the origin, then what do you think is the vertical distance of the mass from the lowest point? Look at the picture that you yourself posted.

Screen Shot 2022-09-26 at 9.20.29 AM.png


If you have not seen Lagrangians, you will not be able to understand the math in post #38.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: babaliaris

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K