I Pendulum Tension Force -- How to calculate the full vector?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension force in a pendulum, specifically seeking the full vector representation of tension, which includes both x and y components. The initial calculations were based on energy conservation and Newton's second law, but the participants clarify that the tension's horizontal component is zero when the pendulum is vertical, leading to a net force of zero in that direction. They emphasize the need to analyze the pendulum's motion at various angles, using a free body diagram to resolve forces and accelerations in radial and tangential directions. Ultimately, the goal is to express the tension as a function of the angle and speed of the pendulum, ensuring that the calculations accurately reflect the dynamics of the system. Understanding these principles is crucial for correctly modeling the pendulum's behavior.
  • #31
babaliaris said:
In other words, I had to add signs as well when writing the ΣF equations which I didn't do.
OK, then do it and write the correct equation for Newton's second law in the y (or r) direction. Be sure to have the correct expression for the acceleration in terms of the speed ##V##.
 
  • Like
Likes babaliaris
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I think I solved it. By the way, I wanted to find out θ(t).

1664136140041.jpg

1664136140034.jpg

1664136140027.jpg
 

Attachments

  • #33
babaliaris said:
I think I solved it. By the way, I wanted to find out θ(t).
I don't think you solved it correctly. The tension depends on the speed ##V##. Your expression for it does not. If you want to find θ(t), you have to solve the differential equation $$\frac{d^2\theta}{dt^2}+\frac{g}{L}\sin\theta =0.$$ You can only solve it approximately, e.g. use the small-angle approximation ##\sin\theta \approx \theta## which of course is invalid here because the pendulum starts at the horizontal position. However, you can find the angular speed as a function of angle, ##\omega(\theta).##
 
  • #34
Can anyone point out my mistake? Maybe the mistake is the way I describe acceleration, it's the only thing I'm not completely sure if it is correct.

Maybe the way that I said ##a_{T} = |a|cos(θ)## ##a_{Ν} = |a|sin(θ)## and then calculated ##|a|## from ##ΣF_{T}=ma_{T}## it's not correct.

And instead, maybe I should have written the ##ΣF_{N} = ma_{N} = m \frac{|V|^{2}}{L}## and use this one to find the tension.

But I would like to know what I did wrong.

I don't see any mistakes in my math, so it must be something in my "Physics way of thinking".
 
  • #35
babaliaris said:
And instead, maybe I should have written the ## ΣFN=maN=\frac{m|V|^2}{L}## and use this one to find the tension.
That’s exactly what you should have done and what I meant when I said relate the tension and the speed. What is that relation?
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #36
##T = m[\frac{|V(t)|^2}{L} + gcos(θ(t))]##

And If I'm correct, this is not a conservative force since it depends on the velocity which depends on time, so, if I was using the principle of conservation of mechanical energy (potential energy in highest point + kinetic energy in highest point = potential energy at the lowest point + kinetic energy at the lowest point) it would be wrong.
 
  • #37
babaliaris said:
##T = m[\frac{|V(t)|^2}{L} + gcos(θ(t))]##

And If I'm correct, this is not a conservative force since it depends on the velocity which depends on time, so, if I was using the principle of conservation of mechanical energy (potential energy in highest point + kinetic energy in highest point = potential energy at the lowest point + kinetic energy at the lowest point) it would be wrong.
It doesn't matter if the tension is conservative or not. It is always perpendicular to the path and ##dW=\mathbf{T}\cdot d\mathbf{s}=0##. This means that the tension does zero work on the mass. It changes the direction of the velocity ##\mathbf{V}## but not the speed ##V##. Use energy conservation to find an expression for ##mV^2## in terms of ##\theta## and put in the equation.
 
  • Like
Likes babaliaris
  • #38
It's easier with Lagrange I, i.e., you don't introduce the angle as a generalized parameter but work with (plane) Cartesian coordinates and imposing the constraint with a Lagrange parameter. The corresponding Lagrangian reads (setting ##\vec{x}=(x,y)##)
$$L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 -mg y +\frac{\lambda}{2} (\vec{x}^2-L^2).$$
The Euler-Lagrange equations read
$$m \ddot{x} = \lambda x, \quad m \ddot{y}=-mg + \lambda y.$$
From this it follows
$$\vec{T}=m \ddot{x}+m g \vec{e}_y = \lambda \vec{x}.$$
To get ##\lambda## note that
$$m x \ddot{x} + m (\ddot{y}+g) y = \lambda(x^2+y^2)=\lambda L^2 \; \Rightarrow \; \lambda = \frac{m(\vec{x} \cdot \ddot{\vec{x}}+g y)}{L^2}.$$
Now you introduce ##\theta## via ##\vec{x}=L(\sin \theta,-\cos \theta)##. Plugging this into the formula for ##\lambda## you find
$$\lambda=-\frac{m}{L} (L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
Thus
$$\vec{T}=-m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta) \begin{pmatrix}\sin \theta \\ -\cos \theta \end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$|\vec{T}|=m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
 
  • #39
kuruman said:
It doesn't matter if the tension is conservative or not. It is always perpendicular to the path and ##dW=\mathbf{T}\cdot d\mathbf{s}=0##. This means that the tension does zero work on the mass. It changes the direction of the velocity ##\mathbf{V}## but not the speed ##V##. Use energy conservation to find an expression for ##mV^2## in terms of ##\theta## and put in the equation.
I understand what you are saying, thanks for this note.

I'm not sure about the potential energy when the pendulum is at its maximum angle, because I don't know what the height is there. I saw on the internet people taking the height = L when the angle of the pendulum is 90 degrees but is this correct? I don't know if the pendulum can reach that high. Maybe it does not matter in terms of energy, since they could reach there if I calmy v(0) = 0 leaving it to fall while holding it at 90 degrees.
vanhees71 said:
It's easier with Lagrange I, i.e., you don't introduce the angle as a generalized parameter but work with (plane) Cartesian coordinates and imposing the constraint with a Lagrange parameter. The corresponding Lagrangian reads (setting ##\vec{x}=(x,y)##)
$$L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2 -mg y +\frac{\lambda}{2} (\vec{x}^2-L^2).$$
The Euler-Lagrange equations read
$$m \ddot{x} = \lambda x, \quad m \ddot{y}=-mg + \lambda y.$$
From this it follows
$$\vec{T}=m \ddot{x}+m g \vec{e}_y = \lambda \vec{x}.$$
To get ##\lambda## note that
$$m x \ddot{x} + m (\ddot{y}+g) y = \lambda(x^2+y^2)=\lambda L^2 \; \Rightarrow \; \lambda = \frac{m(\vec{x} \cdot \ddot{\vec{x}}+g y)}{L^2}.$$
Now you introduce ##\theta## via ##\vec{x}=L(\sin \theta,-\cos \theta)##. Plugging this into the formula for ##\lambda## you find
$$\lambda=-\frac{m}{L} (L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
Thus
$$\vec{T}=-m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta) \begin{pmatrix}\sin \theta \\ -\cos \theta \end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$|\vec{T}|=m(L \dot{\theta}^2 + g \cos \theta).$$
I don't understand this math :P
 
  • #40
babaliaris said:
I understand what you are saying, thanks for this note.

I'm not sure about the potential energy when the pendulum is at its maximum angle, because I don't know what the height is there. I saw on the internet people taking the height = L when the angle of the pendulum is 90 degrees but is this correct? I don't know if the pendulum can reach that high. Maybe it does not matter in terms of energy, since they could reach there if I calmy v(0) = 0 leaving it to fall while holding it at 90 degrees.

I don't understand this math :P
Gravitational potential energy near the surface of the Earth is ##U=mgy## where ##y## is the vertical distance from an origin of your choice to the point where you want to find the potential energy. If you choose the lowest point of the motion as the origin, then what do you think is the vertical distance of the mass from the lowest point? Look at the picture that you yourself posted.

Screen Shot 2022-09-26 at 9.20.29 AM.png


If you have not seen Lagrangians, you will not be able to understand the math in post #38.
 
  • Like
Likes babaliaris

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
343
Replies
8
Views
3K