Calculating Force of Beam on Support at A

Click For Summary
To calculate the force exerted by the beam on support A, one must consider the uniform distribution of the beam's weight and the man's weight while applying the principles of torque. The initial confusion stemmed from misinterpreting the question, leading to an incorrect focus on the force exerted by A on the beam instead of the reverse. The beam's weight should be treated as a uniformly distributed load (UDL), not a point load, affecting torque calculations. The torque from the beam must account for both sections of the beam relative to the pivot point B, with the total torque equating to zero since the system is static. Properly setting up the torque equations will yield the correct force exerted by the beam on support A.
huskydc
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A man of mass mm = 95 kg decides to paint his house. To do this, he builds a platform using a uniform beam with a mass of mb = 100 kg and a length of L = 7 meters. The beam is supported by two sawhorses, as shown in the diagram above.

If the man stands over the support at point B, calculate the force exerted by the beam on the support at A.

--at first, i misread the question and thought it's asking for the force exerted by A on the beam.
and I did the following:

F(A) + F(B) - F(b) - F(m) = 0

and have B as the pivot,

thus with the torque of A = -3 F(A)
and torque of beam (b) = .5 F(b)

, but now it's asking of the F exerted by beam on support at A? I'm confused here...its one whole beam, I'm assuming the force excerted by the beam will occur at the center of mass...help
 

Attachments

  • showme.gif
    showme.gif
    588 bytes · Views: 634
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of the beam on A is the same as the force of A on the beam. (For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction)
 
yea, i initially thought it's asking for F(A), and i tried solving for it, didnt work out, unless i did something wrong in my original calculations...
 
I can't understand why you've been asked the same question twice, but disregrding that, there's a mistake in caculating the torque of the beam.
The beam is a UDL, not a point load acting at its mid-point.
You have to consider the torque from the beam as being up of two parts. one to the left of point B and one to the right.
 
There are two forces of the beam. Since the beam is uniform we can say that one meter has a mass of 100/7 kg. Since two meters are located on the other side of B from the other 5 meters of the beam, you must take that into account as well.

We'll designate the 5 meters to the left of B as b1. The two meters to the right of B shall be called b2.

The problem can be set up as total torque being zero (since it isn't moving). There for the expression for the torque caused by each point is: t(b1)-(t(A)+t(b2))=0. Remember that the torque resulting from the weight of a section of beam essentially acts midway between the end of the beam and the pivot point.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K