Calculating $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ in Quantum Field Theory

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expression $\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}$ in the context of Quantum Field Theory, specifically exploring its decomposition into principal value and Dirac delta function components. Participants are examining the implications of this expression in relation to integrals and causality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the origins of the Dirac delta function and principal value in the expression. Questions arise about the integration process and the role of the infinitesimal $\epsilon$. Some participants explore contour integration techniques and the implications of limits on the integrals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications. Some have shared personal communications from the original author of the material, which have contributed to a deeper understanding of the concepts. However, there remains a level of uncertainty and ongoing questioning regarding the integration methods and interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the expression's right-hand side only makes sense within the context of an integral, and there are discussions about the conditions under which $\epsilon$ can be set to zero. The conversation also highlights the need for careful consideration of the limits and the behavior of functions involved.

koolmodee
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
[tex]\frac{1}{x-i\epsilon}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{x}{x²+a²}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{ia}{x²+a²}[/tex]= P [tex]\frac{1}{x}[/tex]+i pi [tex]\delta[/tex](x)

P means the principal value, a is possibly infinitesimal (?), i is the imaginary unit

Where does the pi, Dirac delta come from? What principal value?
It is from a quantum field theory book.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression contains a Dirac Delta, so that should be your clue to integrate against a test function, [itex]\varphi(x)[/itex] that goes to zero as [itex]x \rightarrow \pm \infty[/itex]. In particular, you want to consider a contour integral

[tex]\int_\gamma dz \frac{\varphi(z)}{z - i\epsilon}[/tex]

about some contour [itex]\gamma[/itex]. Note that the integrand has a pole at [itex]z = i\varepsilon[/itex]. To evaluate, consider the closed contour in the upper half plane that consists of a large semicircle of radius R with a small semicircle of radius b around the pole in the integrand at [itex]z = i\varepsilon[/itex]. Since the contour contains no poles, the contour integral is zero. Parameterize the contour:

[tex]\int_{-R}^{-b}dx \frac{\varphi(x)}{x - i\epsilon} + \int_{b}^{R}dx \frac{\varphi(x)}{x - i\epsilon} + \int_0^{\pi}d(Re^{i\theta}) \frac{\varphi(Re^{i\theta})}{Re^{i\theta}-i\varepsilon} + \int_\pi^{0}d(be^{i\theta}) \frac{\varphi(be^{i\theta})}{be^{i\theta}-i\varepsilon} = 0[/tex]

Now, take the limits as [itex]R \rightarrow \infty[/itex] and [itex]b \rightarrow 0[/itex], and use the definition of the principal part integral:

[tex]\mathcal{P}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx~f(x) = \lim_{a \rightarrow 0} \int_{-\infty}^{-a}dx~f(x) + \int_{a}^{\infty}dx~f(x)[/tex]

and the half-residue theorem, that states that for a semi-circular arc about a pole, the contribution from that arc about the pole as the radius goes to zero is [itex]2\pi i[/itex] times half the residue about that pole. To get the delta function you note that at the pole the test function will give a contribution [itex]\varphi(0)[/itex], and so the action of the imaginary part of [itex](x - i\epsilon)^{-1}[/itex] is to pick out the value of the test function at the origin, which is just what a Dirac delta does. In the end you can set [itex]\epsilon = 0[/itex].
 
Mute, thanks so much!
 
WAIT!

In my OP there was a mistake! I'm very sorry.

It is x/(x²+a²)+ia/(x²+a²) = P 1/x + i pi delta(x) and a possibly infinitesimal.

So RHS are two innocent algebraic terms, the LHS has something to two with integration.

I still can't see how that works.
 
The [itex]\epsilon[/tex] is an infinitesimal. It's there to enforce causality. You can set it to zero after you do your integrals over the left hand side because after that causality has been enforced and you don't need the infinitesimal anymore.<br /> <br /> The right hand side of the expression only makes sense inside an integral. What it says is that when you integrate<br /> <br /> [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \frac{\varphi(x)}{x - i\epsilon}[/tex]<br /> <br /> it's equivalent to integrating<br /> <br /> [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \left[\mathcal{P}\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) + i\pi \delta(x)\right]\varphi(x) = \mathcal{P}\left[\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx~\frac{\varphi(x)}{x}\right] + i\pi \varphi(0)[/tex].[/itex]
 
I really appreciate the effort Mute, but I can't see what you mean here.
 
I wrote the author and he was so kind answering me. If anybody interested here is what he wrote.

It's pretty easy to see how the delta function part works; for any
nonzero x, the function e/(x^2+e^2) goes
to zero as e goes to zero, but the area under it is pi for any e; so it
behaves like pi times delta(x) as e->0.

The principle-value part works similarly; one needs to show that the
integral of x/(x^2+e^2) times a smooth
test function f(x) equals, in the limit e->0, the principle value of
the integral of (1/x)f(x). (To get the principle value,
one replaces (1/x) with zero when -e<x<e, then takes the limit e->0
after doing the integral.)

After comparing that with what Mute said, I think that I understand it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K