Calculating Friction Forces on a Lab Table

Click For Summary
A physics student is calculating friction forces on a lab table with a mass of 36 kg, where the coefficients of static and kinetic friction are 0.21 and 0.16, respectively. Initially, she pushes with 64 N and 69 N, but struggles to determine the friction force, realizing that the static friction can only reach a maximum of 74.16 N, indicating the table remains at rest under these forces. When she increases the push to 80 N, the table begins to move, allowing her to use kinetic friction to calculate the friction force as 56.05 N. The discussion also explores further scenarios involving acceleration and the effects of different applied forces, ultimately leading to a better understanding of the relationship between applied force, friction, and motion. The student successfully resolves the problem after thorough analysis and guidance.
Naeem
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Q.
A physics student is pushing a lab table across the floor. The table as a mass of 36 kg. The coeffient of static friction between the table and the floor is μs = 0.21 and the coefficient of kinetic friction is μk = 0.16.

a) She initially pushes with a force of 64 N. What is the magnitude of the force of friction between the table and the floor?


b) She now pushes with a force of 69 N. What is the magnitude of the force of friction between the table and the floor?


I know that |Fs fric.| = Us . N, and

|Fk fric. | = Uk . N

For the first part I did as follows:

|Fk fric. | = Uk . N
We know the mass of the student so we can calculate the weight. N=mg.

Then Fk fric. , would be Uk.N

Similarly the second part too, but the answers are wrong. Don't know what is wrong with my approach.

Help Requested!
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First thing to figure out: Does it move?

A good thing to know about static friction: \mu N is the maximum value it can be. It will be whatever it needs to be to prevent sliding---up to that maximum value.
 
I tried several things but still the answer is wrong.

Don't even have the slightest idea how to get started? Can anybody out there help me! :cry:

Here is what is did !

divided applied force by mass of table. , found the acc. Tried to use that in the formula . F = Uk .N

Still the answer is wrong.! :confused:
 
Have you tried Doc Al's suggestions yet?
 
Yeah, I do now, that UN is the max. value the table can hold, but the given value is a lot lesser. I really don't know if the table is moving or not.
 
Can you please state the value of MAXIMAL static friction?
 
Us = 0.21 in the question.

Us, max. may be Us . Fn
(0.21) . (36kg)*(9.81)
= 74.16 N
 
Yes, so what does that tell you?
In particular, will the block be at rest or moving?
 
I think the block would be at rest. That's all I now.
 
  • #10
Correct, because it is possible to have a (non-maximal) static friction of value 64N, right?

So, is it possible to have a static friction force of 69N, so that the block will also remain at rest in the next example?
 
  • #11
No, it is not possible for both parts a and b, the answers all simply the applied forces in the question. Thanks, for guiding me step by step for this problem.

Thanks, very much!
 
  • #12
But , now I have a problem with the following parts:

c) She now pushes with a force of 80 N. What is the magnitude of the force of friction between the table and the floor?

d) She now pushes with a force such that the table moves with a velocity of 1.4 m/sec. What is the magnitude of the force of friction between the table and the floor?

e) She now pushes with a force such that the table accelerates at 0.9 m/sec2. What is the magnitude of the force of friction between the table and the floor?
 
  • #13
Yeah, Found answers to part c and d ,

Since the table is moving now we can use Uk to find out the force of friction.

(.16) * (36) * ( 9.81 ) = 56.05 for part c, The applied force is greater than the MAXIMAL Static friction, which was 74.16 N

and for part d too the answer is 56.05 N
 
  • #14
I am trying to figure out part e.

The tables accelarates at 0.9 m/s2. How would we calculate the force of friction now.

we know Uk is 0.16.
 
  • #15
I am trying to figure out part e.

The tables accelarates at 0.9 m/s2. How would we calculate the force of friction now.

we know Uk is 0.16.

The answer again is 56.50 ,same as c and d. Finally got it all, took more than 2 hrs. to do this problem...

THanks,
Naeem
 
  • #16
A problem

!. Masses m1 and m2 rest on a table 1.4 meters above the floor and are attached to m3 via very light string and a frictionless pulley as shown above. The coefficient of static friction between the m2 and the table is μs = 0.21 and their coefficient of kinetic friction is μk = 0.16. m2 = 48 kg and m3 = 24 kg.

m1 is on top of m2 on the table in the picture, and m3 is hanging by means of a pulley in the -ve y direction. There is a chord which connects m2 via a pulley which also connects m3.

Tried to apply Newtons laws to block 3 but no success so far.

They are asking for.

a) What is the minimum mass that m1 can have to keep the two blocks from sliding off the table?

b) m1 is completely removed. What will be the acceleration of m3?

Thanks,
 
  • #17
Hi, folks

I was able to figure out part b)

Here's what I did:

Applied Newtons laws as follows:

for Mass m3 :

+Ft + (24)(-9.81) = (24)a ----- ( 1 )


applied Newtons laws for m2

Ft - Ff = (48)a

Ft - ( .16 ) * (48 ) * ( 9.81 ) = (24)a ------ (2)

Solved 1 and 2 and got accelaration of m3 as -2.22 which is correct

My ideas was that if the system of m1 and m2 is moved to the right assuming it as the +ve x directon , m3 would move in the -ve y direction. so a for both the equations would be a = +a2 = -a3

So, how can I figure out part a ) , how can I find the mass of m1. How can I apply Newtons Laws to m1.?


Please help!




Thanks,
 
  • #18
Naeem said:
So, how can I figure out part a ) , how can I find the mass of m1. How can I apply Newtons Laws to m1.?
Hints for part a: Treat m1 and m2 as a single object. What's the tension in the cord? What must the friction force be on m2?
 
  • #19
I don't know if I am right, but here is what I did for part a .

Ft-Ffric = ( m1 + m2 ) a

Ft= ( m1 + m2 ) * a + Ffric

= ( m1 + 48 ) * (-2.22 ) + Us ( m1 + 48 ) * (-9.81)

That's all I now. Plz. help
 
  • #20
Here is what I did right now!

For m1 not to slide, max horizontal force forward is Fs=uS*m1*g=m1*a
So, the system acceleration cannot exceed the max acceleration for m1

a = uS*g

For the system

m3*g - uK(m1+m2)g = (m1+m2+m3)a = (m2+m1+m3)(uS*g)

rearrange, and collect like terms in m3

m3*g - uS*m3*g = uS(m2 + m1)g + uK(m2 + m1)g

common factor of g leaves

m3(1 - uS) = (uS + uK)(m2 + m1)

and, finally

m3 = [(uS+uK)(m2+m1)]/(1-uS)

I tried to use this equation to find minimum mass for m1 but doesn't work.

Can anybody tell me what is wrong to the approach
 

Attachments

  • Blocks and Pulley.gif
    Blocks and Pulley.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 506
  • #21
If the blocks are not supposed to slide (or move), what must their acceleration be ?
 
  • #22
I guess the acceleration must be zero.

Am I right :shy:

If this correct, then what applies next
 
  • #23
Right ...now look at your post #19 again.

Set a=0, here. You now get Ft = Us ( m1 + 48 ) * (9.81).

Now look at mass m3. What is its acceleration ? What are the forces acting on it ? Write down the equation. That should tell you what Ft is. Plug this into the above equation to get m1.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
Yeah, gokul did that got the answer finally, thanks for the insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K