Calculating $\Gamma^2_{chir}$ in General Dimensions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions General
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expression $\Gamma^{2}_{chir} = 1$ in general dimensions, specifically addressing whether to use $\Gamma_{chir} \Gamma_{chir}$ or $\Gamma_{chir} \Gamma_{chir}^{\dagger}$. It is established that in odd dimensions, $\gamma_{(5)}$ is a fundamental gamma matrix, and $\Gamma$ can be defined as $\Gamma = i^{a} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1}$. The calculations reveal that $\Gamma \Gamma = (-1)^{a + \frac{D+1}{2}}$ must equal 1, leading to the requirement that the exponent be even. The discussion concludes that the constraints on $a$ depend on the dimensionality $D$ and the parity of the exponent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma matrices in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with the properties of Hermitian matrices
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in theoretical physics
  • Basic grasp of commutation relations and Schur's Lemma
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gamma matrices in various dimensions
  • Research the implications of Hermitian matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of Schur's Lemma in representation theory
  • Explore the significance of dimensionality in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as advanced students studying the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I am sorry, this is a rather dump question- more like a notation question since the sources I've looked into don't specify it... But in case I want to calculate (in general dimensions) the:
\Gamma^{2}_{chir} =1
Do I have to take:
\Gamma_{chir} \Gamma_{chir}

or
\Gamma_{chir} \Gamma_{chir}^{\dagger}
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\gamma_{5} is an hermitain matrix.

so \gamma_{5}=\gamma_{5}^{\dagger}

so both options are the same
 
is that true in general dimensions? For example D= 5 dims?
 
ChrisVer said:
is that true in general dimensions? For example D= 5 dims?

There is no \gamma_{ ( 5 ) }" in odd dimensional spacetime. In fact, in odd dimensions, It is one of the fundamental Gammas. For examples: D=3,
\gamma_{ ( 5 ) } \equiv \sigma_{ 3 } = - i \sigma_{ 1 } \sigma_{ 2 } , \ \ -i \sigma_{ 1 } \sigma_{ 2 } \sigma_{ 3 } = I

And in D = 5, \gamma_{ ( 5 ) } \equiv \gamma^{ 4 }
 
Last edited:
In general D dimensions you can always define a gamma 5:

\Gamma = i^{a} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1}

So far I've proven that \Gamma anticommutes with \gamma^{M} if D=even and commutes if D=odd... In the case of D=odd, because it commutes with all the gamma matrices (I think because of Schur's Lemma) you have \Gamma \propto 1
And I'm trying to find the constraint on a so that I can fulfill the requirement that \Gamma^{2}=1
However I am not sure if by the square they mean \Gamma \Gamma or \Gamma \Gamma^{\dagger}...

In \Gamma \Gamma case I have:
\Gamma \Gamma= (i)^{2a} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1}
By doing the commutations properly I get:*
\Gamma \Gamma= (i)^{2a} (-1)^{\frac{D+1}{2}} 1 = (-1)^{a+\frac{D+1}{2}}

So if I want to get the identity matrix, I must ask for the exponent to be even.
a+\frac{D+1}{2}= 2n
a= \frac{4n-D-1}{2}
In the simplest case n=0 so that (-1)^0=+1 and we have:
a= - \frac{D+1}{2}
However if \Gamma^{2}= \Gamma \Gamma^{\dagger}
and by supposing that:
\gamma_{0}^{\dagger}= \gamma_{0}
\gamma_{i}^{\dagger}= \gamma_{0} \gamma_{i} \gamma_{0}

I have:

\Gamma \Gamma^{\dagger}= (i)^{2a} (-1)^{a} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1}\gamma_{D-1}^{\dagger} ... \gamma_{1}^{\dagger} \gamma_{0}^{\dagger}

now inserting the above assumption:

\Gamma \Gamma^{\dagger}= (i)^{2a} (-1)^{a} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{D-1} \gamma_{0} ... \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{0}

Now inside D points, you have D-1 regions (in this case it means D-1 \gamma_{0}^{2})**. Since D is odd, D-1 is even and thus the result is just a +.

\Gamma \Gamma^{\dagger}= (-1)^{2a} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{1} ... \gamma_{D-1} \gamma_{0} \gamma_{D-1}... \gamma_{1}

Since all the gammas commute with \Gamma I can move the middle \gamma_{0} to the 1st place, without a problem, where I'll get \gamma_{0}^{2}=-1 and the rest gammas will start cancelling each other one after the other without changing anything (+)(+)(+) etc...

\Gamma \Gamma^{\dagger}= (-1)^{2a+1}

again asking for the power to be even:
2a+1 =2n
a= \frac{2n-1}{2}
Again in the simplest case a= \pm \frac{1}{2} ( \pm because I don't know if it's needed to be positive or negative, for - n=0, for + n=1)

*eg
D=1, ~~00 =-1
D=3, ~~ 012 012= +1
D=5, ~~ 0123401234= -1
etc
So for general D I have (-1)^{\frac{D+1}{2}}
**eg
D=3, ~~ 012 2'1'0' = 012 0 200100= 012021 * (-1)^{2}
D=5, ~~ 01234 4'3'2'1'0'=012340400300200100= 0123404321 * (-1)^{4}
D=7, ~~ 0123456 6'5'4'3'2'1'0'= 01234560600500400300200100 = 01234560654321 * (-1)^{6}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K