A Calculating geodesic equation from Hamiltonian in presence of EM

Jokar
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
I have a Hamiltonian

$$
H = \frac{1}{2} g^{\alpha \beta}\left(p_\alpha- A_\alpha\right)\left(p_\beta- A_\beta\right)
$$

I want to calculate the equation of motion. How can I calculate the equation of motions

$$
\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} = g^{\mu\nu}(p_\nu - A_\nu)
$$

This one is straight forward. However, how can I calculate

$$
\frac{dp^\mu}{d\tau} -\Gamma^\mu_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\tau} = g^{\mu\nu} F_{\nu\beta} p^\beta
$$

Can someone please help me with the derivation or give me some reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I never saw derivation of geodesic from Hamiltonian, but it seems to work indeed. Where did you find this?

Regarding how to proceed with the derivation. You already used the first equation, namely
$$\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\alpha}$$
Now use the second one
$$\frac{dp_\alpha}{d\tau}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial x^\alpha}$$
Note that both ##g## and ##A## depend on ##x##, while ##p## doesn't.

Though the derivation actually splits into two separate parts - one for geodesic equation (no force) and other for the Lorentz force. And it's easier to do these parts individually, so I'd suggest to start without EM field, namely with ##H=\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} p_\alpha p_\beta## (you should get the usual Euler-Lagrange equation for geodesic) and only than add the field.

I didn't go through the calculation to the very end myself, but I'm more or less confident I can do it. So feel free to ask if you have issues with particular steps.
 
Thanks. I am also doing the same thing. But I think there are some steps in between.

If you take the derivative then you will get

$$
\frac{dp_\gamma}{d\tau} = -\frac{1}{2}
\frac{\partial {g^{\alpha\beta}}}{\partial x^\gamma}
(p_\alpha - A_\alpha)(p_\beta - A_\beta) + g^{\alpha\beta}(p_\alpha - A_\alpha)\frac{\partial A_\beta}{\partial x^\gamma}
$$

What next? How can get the Christoffel symbol and the electromagnetic tensor. Am I doing anything wrong?
 
Yuras said:
I never saw derivation of geodesic from Hamiltonian, but it seems to work indeed. Where did you find this?

Regarding how to proceed with the derivation. You already used the first equation, namely
$$\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\alpha}$$
Now use the second one
$$\frac{dp_\alpha}{d\tau}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial x^\alpha}$$
Note that both ##g## and ##A## depend on ##x##, while ##p## doesn't.

Though the derivation actually splits into two separate parts - one for geodesic equation (no force) and other for the Lorentz force. And it's easier to do these parts individually, so I'd suggest to start without EM field, namely with ##H=\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} p_\alpha p_\beta## (you should get the usual Euler-Lagrange equation for geodesic) and only than add the field.

I didn't go through the calculation to the very end myself, but I'm more or less confident I can do it. So feel free to ask if you have issues with particular steps.

Any help?
 
You have two equations. Now you use the first one to eliminate ##p## from the second one. Note the convenient ##p_\mu-A_\mu## in the second one waiting to be replaced with the first one. Also when replacing ##p## on the left side, you'll peek up another derivative of the metric (it will go to the Christoffel symbol together with the one of the right) and a derivative of ##A## (it will make the EM tensor together with the other one). Collect few terms, do a bit of algebra and you are almost there.
 
Thanks. I did not replace it in the left side. So I was not getting the answer. Thank you very much.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top