A Calculating geodesic equation from Hamiltonian in presence of EM

Jokar
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
I have a Hamiltonian

$$
H = \frac{1}{2} g^{\alpha \beta}\left(p_\alpha- A_\alpha\right)\left(p_\beta- A_\beta\right)
$$

I want to calculate the equation of motion. How can I calculate the equation of motions

$$
\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} = g^{\mu\nu}(p_\nu - A_\nu)
$$

This one is straight forward. However, how can I calculate

$$
\frac{dp^\mu}{d\tau} -\Gamma^\mu_{\alpha\beta}\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}\frac{dx^\beta}{d\tau} = g^{\mu\nu} F_{\nu\beta} p^\beta
$$

Can someone please help me with the derivation or give me some reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I never saw derivation of geodesic from Hamiltonian, but it seems to work indeed. Where did you find this?

Regarding how to proceed with the derivation. You already used the first equation, namely
$$\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\alpha}$$
Now use the second one
$$\frac{dp_\alpha}{d\tau}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial x^\alpha}$$
Note that both ##g## and ##A## depend on ##x##, while ##p## doesn't.

Though the derivation actually splits into two separate parts - one for geodesic equation (no force) and other for the Lorentz force. And it's easier to do these parts individually, so I'd suggest to start without EM field, namely with ##H=\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} p_\alpha p_\beta## (you should get the usual Euler-Lagrange equation for geodesic) and only than add the field.

I didn't go through the calculation to the very end myself, but I'm more or less confident I can do it. So feel free to ask if you have issues with particular steps.
 
Thanks. I am also doing the same thing. But I think there are some steps in between.

If you take the derivative then you will get

$$
\frac{dp_\gamma}{d\tau} = -\frac{1}{2}
\frac{\partial {g^{\alpha\beta}}}{\partial x^\gamma}
(p_\alpha - A_\alpha)(p_\beta - A_\beta) + g^{\alpha\beta}(p_\alpha - A_\alpha)\frac{\partial A_\beta}{\partial x^\gamma}
$$

What next? How can get the Christoffel symbol and the electromagnetic tensor. Am I doing anything wrong?
 
Yuras said:
I never saw derivation of geodesic from Hamiltonian, but it seems to work indeed. Where did you find this?

Regarding how to proceed with the derivation. You already used the first equation, namely
$$\frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}=\frac{\partial H}{\partial p_\alpha}$$
Now use the second one
$$\frac{dp_\alpha}{d\tau}=-\frac{\partial H}{\partial x^\alpha}$$
Note that both ##g## and ##A## depend on ##x##, while ##p## doesn't.

Though the derivation actually splits into two separate parts - one for geodesic equation (no force) and other for the Lorentz force. And it's easier to do these parts individually, so I'd suggest to start without EM field, namely with ##H=\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} p_\alpha p_\beta## (you should get the usual Euler-Lagrange equation for geodesic) and only than add the field.

I didn't go through the calculation to the very end myself, but I'm more or less confident I can do it. So feel free to ask if you have issues with particular steps.

Any help?
 
You have two equations. Now you use the first one to eliminate ##p## from the second one. Note the convenient ##p_\mu-A_\mu## in the second one waiting to be replaced with the first one. Also when replacing ##p## on the left side, you'll peek up another derivative of the metric (it will go to the Christoffel symbol together with the one of the right) and a derivative of ##A## (it will make the EM tensor together with the other one). Collect few terms, do a bit of algebra and you are almost there.
 
Thanks. I did not replace it in the left side. So I was not getting the answer. Thank you very much.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Back
Top