MHB Calculating G's Distance from BH on an ABCD.EFGH Cube

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
Click For Summary
In an ABCD.EFGH cube with a side length of 8, the distance from point G to line BH is under discussion. The initial calculations yielded $$\frac{8}{3}\sqrt6$$ cm, which does not match any of the provided answer choices. Participants confirm that the cube's structure is understood as having the base ABCD with vertical sides EA, FB, GC, and HD. There is agreement on the interpretation of the cube's geometry. The conversation highlights a potential issue with the answer options provided.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
In an ABCD.EFGH cube whose side length is 8, the distance between the point G and the line BH is ...
A. 4 cm
B. $$4\sqrt2$$ cm
C. $$4\sqrt3$$ cm
D. $$8\sqrt2$$ cm
E. $$8\sqrt3$$ cm

I got $$\frac{8}{3}\sqrt6$$ cm. Do you guys get the same answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
In an ABCD.EFGH cube whose side length is 8, the distance between the point G and the line BH is ...
A. 4 cm
B. $$4\sqrt2$$ cm
C. $$4\sqrt3$$ cm
D. $$8\sqrt2$$ cm
E. $$8\sqrt3$$ cm

I got $$\frac{8}{3}\sqrt6$$ cm. Do you guys get the same answer?
I agree with you: $\frac83\sqrt6$. It's odd that in two separate problems the answer does not appear in the list of choices.

I am getting these answers on the assumption that "an ABCD.EFGH cube" means a cube where the base is ABCD, and the upper vertices are above the corresponding lower ones, so that EA, FB, GC and HD are the vertical sides. Presumably that is what is intended?
 
Opalg said:
I am getting these answers on the assumption that "an ABCD.EFGH cube" means a cube where the base is ABCD, and the upper vertices are above the corresponding lower ones, so that EA, FB, GC and HD are the vertical sides. Presumably that is what is intended?

Yes, that is what's intended.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
896
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K