MHB Calculating Height of RC Glider from Ground and Air Measurements

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of an RC glider based on ground and air measurements, both the apparent size and the distance from the observer's eye are crucial. The glider measures 2200 mm on the ground and appears to be 35 mm in the air, but this measurement alone is insufficient without knowing the distance from the observer. The formula provided indicates that height can be derived from the relationship between these measurements. Additionally, the discussion highlights the subjective nature of size perception based on distance, referencing a book that illustrates how people estimate sizes differently. Overall, accurate height calculation requires both size and distance information for meaningful results.
cloned33
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,just seeing if someone can help me on here,i have a rc glider measuring 2200 mm on the ground,when in the air it measures about 35mm. Can the the height be calculated from these measurements.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cloned33 said:
Hello, just seeing if someone can help me on here. I have a rc glider measuring 2200 mm on the ground; when in the air it

What do you mean by "it" here? The shadow on the ground? Or the silhouette?
 
cloned33 said:
i have a rc glider measuring 2200 mm on the ground,when in the air it measures about 35mm. Can the the height be calculated from these measurements.
No, the height depends on what distance from the eye the image of the glider measures 35 mm. If you hold a ruler in a stretched hand and the glider seems to measure 35 mm, that's quite different from when hold the ruler right next to your eye. So, 35 mm alone is not a meaningful measurement, you also need to add the distance $d$ from the eye so that that 35 mm at this distance seems like 1200 mm at real distance $h$.


In that case, $h=\frac{1200}{35}d$.

In this regard, I recommend reading a wonderful book "Physics for Entertainment" (part 2) by Yakov Perelman. In Chapter 9 (p. 210) he says the following.

"A few words, by the by, about the Moon's visible proportions. Ask your friends how big they think the Moon is. You're likely to get a host of different replies. Most will say the Moon is as large as a plate, but some might think it the size of a saucer, an apple, or even a cherry. A schoolboy I once knew always thought the Moon 'as big as a round table covered for twelve' while a certain writer has claimed in a book that the Moon is a 'yard across'.

Why do we differ so much with regard to the size or one and the same thing? Because we estimate distances differently and moreover subconsciously. A person who takes the Moon to be as large as an apple, imagines it to be much nearer than people who think it the size of a plate or a round table."
 

Attachments

  • visible-angle.png
    visible-angle.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 90
Ackbach said:
What do you mean by "it" here? The shadow on the ground? Or the silhouette?

hello,im not into maths but ill try to explain what I want to solve. if I met you and I thought you was 6foot tall, if you then walked away from me till you only looked 1inch tall,whats the distance from where you stood to where you stopped
 
thank you for the reply,I see I need to go back to school this all seems way above my head.to me it seemed a straight forward calculation but nothings simple these days regards martin
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top