Calculating Horizontal Velocity of Rock Kicked Off Bridge in Arkansas

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rock being kicked horizontally off a bridge that is 321m high, with a horizontal displacement of 45.0m. Participants are discussing the initial conditions of the rock's motion, particularly the initial vertical velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the reasoning behind the assertion that there is no initial vertical velocity when the rock is kicked horizontally. They discuss the implications of the rock's motion under gravity and the distinction between horizontal and vertical components of motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is focused on clarifying the initial conditions of the rock's motion. Some participants have reached an understanding of the concept of free fall and the effects of gravity, while others are questioning the nature of the rock's trajectory and the relationship between the vertical and horizontal distances traveled.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the assumptions made in the problem regarding initial velocities and the effects of gravity, as well as the potential neglect of factors like air resistance.

MIA6
Messages
231
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bridge rises 321m above the Arkansas river. Suppose you kick a rock horizontally off the bridge. The magnitude of the rock's horizontal displacement is 45.0 m. Fine the speed at which the rock was kicked.


Homework Equations


Vi=Vx. Dx=45m. Dy=-321m


The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the speed, but my question is on my book, it says that there is no initial vertical velocity. WHy? i think when you kick a rock off the bridge, there is a initial vertical velocity?! so why the vertical initial velocity is 0? hope you can explain it to me.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MIA6 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to find the speed, but my question is on my book, it says that there is no initial vertical velocity. WHy? i think when you kick a rock off the bridge, there is a initial vertical velocity?! so why the vertical initial velocity is 0? hope you can explain it to me.
The rock is kicked horizontally (impulsively) off the bridge so that it has a constant horizontal velocity only as it leaves the bridge. It then starts falling vertically with zero initial velocity, as though it was simply released from rest. It then obviously starts accelerating with gravity.

In the time that it take to fall from the point of release to the ground, it also travels 45 m horizontally.
 
ok, i get it. so the ball travels 321m vertically in free fall?
 
MIA6 said:
ok, i get it. so the ball travels 321m vertically in free fall?
Yes. Constant acceleration, g, with no initial velocity (and perhaps ignoring wind resistance).
 
but i have a question, because i know that 321m is a path that vertical straight down, but the path that the ball travels is half of the parabola, so if we meansure the curve and the straight line, they won't be the same.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K