Calculating isentropic efficiency of a compressor

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the isentropic efficiency of a compressor using experimental data from an electric motor-driven setup. Key measurements included air mass flow rate, stagnation pressure difference, air density, shaft torque, and rotational speed, leading to an initial efficiency calculation of 0.094. Concerns were raised about the low efficiency value, with suggestions that the pressure difference might be unusually low. The compressor in question is a Budworth two-stage axial flow type. Overall, while the mass flow rate appears reasonable, the pressure difference warrants further investigation.
MattH150197
Messages
60
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


We did an experiment which included having an electric motor provide power to drive the compressor and we had instrumentation available to measure the compressor shaft torque and shaft rotational speed and 6 water filled manometer tubes were used as measurements of the pressure. Using the manometer heights we was asked to calculate the isentropic efficiency.

Homework Equations


The equation we were given to used: isentropic efficiency = (air mass flow rate * Difference in stagnation pressure across the compressor)/ (air density * compressor shaft torque * shaft rotational speed)

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the air mass flow rate at 3.89 kg/s, the difference in stagnation pressure at 1900.92 pa, air density at 1.21 kg/m3, shaft torque at 213.86 N.m and rotational speed at 303.68 rad/s from those I got an answer of 0.094 I am new to this subject so not sure what kind of numbers I should be getting but that answer seems really low, is there any numbers you can see that seem unreasonable or could it be correct? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MattH150197 said:

Homework Statement


We did an experiment which included having an electric motor provide power to drive the compressor and we had instrumentation available to measure the compressor shaft torque and shaft rotational speed and 6 water filled manometer tubes were used as measurements of the pressure. Using the manometer heights we was asked to calculate the isentropic efficiency.

Homework Equations


The equation we were given to used: isentropic efficiency = (air mass flow rate * Difference in stagnation pressure across the compressor)/ (air density * compressor shaft torque * shaft rotational speed)

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the air mass flow rate at 3.89 kg/s, the difference in stagnation pressure at 1900.92 pa, air density at 1.21 kg/m3, shaft torque at 213.86 N.m and rotational speed at 303.68 rad/s from those I got an answer of 0.094 I am new to this subject so not sure what kind of numbers I should be getting but that answer seems really low, is there any numbers you can see that seem unreasonable or could it be correct? Thanks
Did you mean stagnation pressure or static pressure? Also, is this a tiny little compressor or a great big compressor?
 
Stagnation pressure and the compressor used was a Budworth two stage axial flow compressor
 
MattH150197 said:
Stagnation pressure and the compressor used was a Budworth two stage axial flow compressor
Please show us your calculations.
 
Im sorry it's really kind of hard to show you how I did the calculation because for example to get the air mass flow rate I had to do 3 separate calulations to get that value so I'd have to write lots of different calculations, I really appreciate you helping but would you say that the value I got for the isentropic efficiency is plausible or not? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    56.9 KB · Views: 1,073
The mass flow rate seems OK. The pressure difference seems low (to me), for whatever that's worth.
 
Okay thanks very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K