MHB Calculating Kinetic Energy of a Block on an Inclined Plane

Teh
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
A block of mass 9kg is initially at rest at the top of an inclined plane of ramp length 4m.

-Assuming that the plane is frictionless, calculate the speed of the block at the bottom of the plane.

-Now instead assume the a frictionless force of Ffr = 2 Newtons opposes the motion of the block. Calculate the speed of the block at the bottom of the planeView attachment 5601I am stuck may anyone help me?
 

Attachments

  • 13250279_1359890954039693_2010993285_n.jpg
    13250279_1359890954039693_2010993285_n.jpg
    41.8 KB · Views: 105
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, first you need to compute the initial energy of the block, and the final energy of the block, and equate the two since there are no non-conservative forces at work.

Initially, the block has no kinetic energy, but it has gravitational potential energy. Can you give the total initial energy?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top