Calculating Line Integral of C from (1,0) to (3,1)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating a line integral along a segment from the point (1,0) to (3,1). The integral is expressed in terms of x and y, and participants are discussing the setup and execution of the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up the integral by parameterizing the line segment and substituting variables. They express confusion regarding the integration process and the application of differentials. Other participants question the notation and clarify the separation of terms in the integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on notation and the structure of the integral. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet, but some clarifications have been offered regarding the integration process.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings about the notation and the relationship between dx and dy in the context of line integrals. The original poster's integration limits are noted to remain unchanged despite the notation issues.

popo902
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose C is the line segment from the point (1,0) to the point (3,1). Compute the line integral
intC {( xdx + (x + y)}dy



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i graphed the line that connects(1,0) to (1,3) and i got the equation of that line
so y = 1/2(x-1) or y=1/2x -1/2
dy= 1/2
i set x=t
and dx=1
my endpoints of integration became t=1 and t=3
then i plugged everything in
so my integral looked like this
1<= t<= 3 {(t(1) + (t + (1/2t - 1/2)) }1/2

i simplified that to this:
5/4t - 1/4

and i integrated that over 1->3
and i got 9/2...but it's wrong?
can someone tell me what I am doing wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I could fuss about your notation a bit but I won't. In {(t(1) + (t + (1/2t - 1/2)) }1/2 you've got the (1/2) from dy multiplying the dx part too. Make it t+(t+(t/2-1/2))*(1/2).
 
oh i don't multiply the dy by the whole thing?
so i seprate the dx from the dy
but the points of integration at t are still the same tho right?
 
I think you want to integrate x*dx+(x+y)*dy. A line integral (x*dx+(x+y))*dy doesn't make much sense. Everything else seems ok.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K