Calculating Line Integrals Using Stokes' Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating line integrals using Stokes' Theorem, specifically with the vector field F = (y, x, x*z) and the quarter-circle contour C in the z-plane defined by z=1. The user initially calculated the line integral to be 1/2 but encountered issues applying Stokes' Theorem due to the contour not being closed. The correct approach involves integrating around the entire boundary of the quarter circle, which results in a surface integral of zero, confirming the necessity of a closed contour for Stokes' Theorem to apply.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and line integrals
  • Familiarity with Stokes' Theorem
  • Knowledge of curl and surface integrals
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly in parametric equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Stokes' Theorem in various contexts
  • Learn how to compute the curl of vector fields
  • Explore examples of closed contours in vector calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between line integrals and surface integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on vector calculus and the application of Stokes' Theorem in solving line integrals.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Calculus - Stokes' theorem

Homework Statement


I have F in Cartesian coordinates (F is a vector): F = (y , x , x*z) and a curve C given by the quarter-circle in the z-plane z=1 (so t : (cos(t) , sin(t) , 1) for t between 0 and Pi/4).

I have found the line integral, and it equals 1/2.

For fun I wanted to find the same line-integral using Stokes' theorem, so I find the curl of F to be (0 , -z , 0) and dS I find by finding the normalvector, which is the cross-product between n_r and n_t. This gives a z-component (of course) with magnitude r - but then the surface integral is zero?

Where is my error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can only use Stokes theorem if you have a closed contour. Try doing the contour integral around the whole boundary of the quarter circle. Then you should get zero.
 
Ah man, of course; hadn't thought of that.

You saved me again, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K