Calculating Lowest Frequency of EMR to Initiate Photocurrent

  • Thread starter Thread starter ussrasu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the lowest frequency of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) required to initiate a photocurrent when UV radiation of a specific wavelength falls on a metal target, resulting in the liberation of electrons with a given maximum kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the photoelectric effect formula, expressing the relationship between energy, work function, and kinetic energy. Some participants question the interpretation of energy terms and their conservation, particularly regarding the treatment of energy changes.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of the final answer, while others are exploring the conceptual framework behind the energy terms used in the calculations. There is an ongoing examination of the definitions and assumptions related to energy conservation in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the terminology and conceptual understanding of energy changes in the photoelectric effect, particularly the notion of negative energy changes and their implications for the calculations presented.

ussrasu
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Can some please review this question and tell me if the working looks correct? Please advise of any mistakes i may have made. Thanks

Q: UV radiation (wavelength = 250 nm) falls on a metal target, and electrons are liberated. If the maximum kinetic energy of these electrons is 1.00*10^-19 J, what is the lowest frequency EMR that will initiate a photocurrent on this target?

A: E = Ø + K = h*(c/λ)

Therfore Ø = ((h*c)/250*10^-9) - 1*10^-19
Which = 6.96*10^-19 J
= h*f

Therefore f = 1.05*10^15 Hz

Is this what i am supposed to do? Thanks for any help! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your final answer is correct.

I find it peculiar that you group " Ø + K " together
- it's NOT the total Energy " E " of any configuration!
Rather, it's the NEGATIVE Energy change of the electron
(- E_initial + E_final) ... so it does equal E_photon,initial.

Most of us learn conservation laws as
"final = initial + change" or "change = final - initial" ,
once in a while as "in - out = change".
Is there a word for this "negative change"?
 
This is what my demonstrator told me to use?
 
Do you see how it comes from E conservation?
Ø is just the negative of the electron's initial PE, etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K