Calculating Magnetic Field Intensity Between Two Parallel Wires

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Wires
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 10K views
Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two long parallel wires are a center-to-center distance of 1.50 cm apart and carry equal anti-parallel currents of 1.80 A. Find the magnetic field intensity at the point P which is equidistant from the wires. (R = 4.00 cm).

Homework Equations


[tex]B= \frac{u_{0}I}{2\pi r}[/tex] infinite wire

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok I have been workin this problem for a while.
In terms of vectors, the y's cancel out.
For the X direction I get:
[tex]B_{totalx}=\frac{u_{0} I R}{\pi \sqrt( (d/2)^2 +R^2)}[/tex]
I don't get why I am wrong, I took the sum of the b-fields in terms of vectors.
And no the answer is not 0 T!
 

Attachments

  • TwoParallelWires.jpg
    TwoParallelWires.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 655
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that the Magnetic field is not zero?
 
Thats what I thought originally , but it is incorrect.
 
If they have equal, anti-parallel currents, and it's a point that's equidistance from the wires, then the answer has to be zero. Unless you decide to ignore the fact that magnetic fields are vectors.
 
PiratePhysicist said:
If they have equal, anti-parallel currents, and it's a point that's equidistance from the wires, then the answer has to be zero. Unless you decide to ignore the fact that magnetic fields are vectors.
Thats what I used to think too, but when I entered 0 T it is incorrect.
there is something else I am missing.
 
TVP45 said:
Anti-parallel.
got an idea?
 
Go back and ask your instructor what he means by anti-parallel. It has more than one meaning. It shouldn't but it does.
 
I agree, word choice could be better.
However I don't have contact with my prof. right now, this assignment is due in an hour.
 
If I was you I would give your best guess (ignore that you know it's "not right") and argue for points later. Chances are others having the same problem.
 
perhaps his answer is wrong by mistake? talk to other people in the class
 
he is not, there is an answer I people got. There is some trick though, but my math tells me otherwise,
 
PiratePhysicist said:
If they have equal, anti-parallel currents, and it's a point that's equidistance from the wires, then the answer has to be zero. Unless you decide to ignore the fact that magnetic fields are vectors.

? The two B fields add up, they don't cancel!
It's when the currents are in the same direction that the total B field is zero at the point midway between them.
 
Last edited:
Winzer said:
[tex]B= \frac{u_{0}I}{2\pi r}[/tex] infinite wire
Good.

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok I have been workin this problem for a while.
In terms of vectors, the y's cancel out.
True.
For the X direction I get:
[tex]B_{totalx}=\frac{u_{0} I R}{\pi \sqrt( (d/2)^2 +R^2)}[/tex]
I don't get why I am wrong, I took the sum of the b-fields in terms of vectors.
Show how you got that answer--it's not dimensionally correct, for one.
 
OK, now that I can see your diagram, I see the instructor used anti-parallel in the correct sense.