Calculating Mean Curvature of a Scalar Field | Homework Solution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mean curvature of a scalar field defined by φ=x²+y²-z²-1. The scalar field H is expressed in terms of the gradient of φ, and participants are tasked with evaluating H when φ=0, specifically as a function of z.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the gradient of φ and its normalization. There are questions about the correct expression for ∇φ and its magnitude. Some participants express confusion about how to impose the constraint φ=0 and how to eliminate variables in the expression for H.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified mistakes in the calculations and are exploring the implications of these errors. Guidance has been offered regarding the correct form of the gradient and its magnitude. There is an acknowledgment of misunderstandings related to the lecture content, and one participant reports making progress after recognizing their mistake.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is a hint provided to work in Cartesian coordinates and to use specific substitutions, which some participants are struggling to implement correctly.

whatisreality
Messages
286
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider the scalar field φ=x2+y2-z2-1. Let H be the scalar field defined by
H = -0.5∇.(∇φ/ abs(∇φ)), where abs(∇φ) is the magnitude of ∇φ. Which makes that some sort of unit quantity. When H is evaluated for φ=0 it is the mean curvature of the level surface φ=0.
Calculate H. Write your answer as a function of z only.
Hint: Work in Cartesian coordinates x, y, z throughout the whole of part (c) and make sure that that you work out all of the derivatives before imposing the constraint Φ = 0. You will find it useful to use the abbreviation r = √(x2+y2+z2. I didn't use any of this, so I'm doing it wrong!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I got (∇φ/ abs(∇φ)) to be 1/√3 x i + 1/√3 y j +1/√3 z k where i, j and k are unit vectors. From this, ∇.(∇φ/ abs(∇φ))=1/√3. This is clearly wrong, wolfram alpha disagrees, I didn't use r, I don't know how to impose the constraint and I think it's something pretty fundamental that I'm missing! I have looked at examples online but they really haven't helped at all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have made some serious mistake in calculating ##\nabla\phi/|\nabla\phi|## cause the result you give doesn't have magnitude 1. From what i can see, it is something like ## \frac{x}{r} i+ \frac{y}{r} j- \frac{z}{r} k##.

To impose the constraint use that ##\phi=0\rightarrow x^2+y^2=z^2+1## to eliminate x and y in the expression you ll calculate for H.
 
Delta² said:
You have made some serious mistake in calculating ##\nabla\phi/|\nabla\phi|## cause the result you give doesn't have magnitude 1. From what i can see, it is something like ## \frac{x}{r} i+ \frac{y}{r} j- \frac{z}{r} k##.

To impose the constraint use that ##\phi=0\rightarrow x^2+y^2=z^2+1## to eliminate x and y in the expression you ll calculate for H.
Perfect person for the question, love the name :D I think I seriously misunderstood our lecture, because I thought ∇φ was obtained by ∂φ/∂x i + ∂φ/dy j + ∂φ/dz k? Which would make ∇φ = 2x i + 2y j -2z k. Actually, maybe my magnitude was wrong! Should it be 2√(x2+y2+z2)?
 
yes that should be the correct magnitude. and yes i love that you love my name, it is inspired by the laplacian operator :D.
 
I got to an answer! Can't believe I didn't see that mistake, the magnitude was clearly meant to be 1. Thank you! :) Vector calculus, not one of my strengths!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K