Calculating Minimum Distance p+q

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Callisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum distance \( p + q \) between an object and its image for a given focal length \( f \) using the lens formula \( \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = \frac{1}{f} \). Participants confirm that the relationship between \( p \) and \( q \) is hyperbolic, and through calculus, they derive that the minimum distance occurs at \( p + q = 4f \). The exclusion of zero values for \( p \) and \( q \) is emphasized, as they lead to undefined results in the lens equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the thin lens formula and its components
  • Basic calculus for differentiation and finding minima
  • Graphing hyperbolic functions
  • Knowledge of undefined mathematical expressions in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of hyperbolas in optics
  • Learn more about the implications of the lens formula in real-world applications
  • Explore calculus techniques for optimization problems
  • Investigate the behavior of light at infinity and its effects on focal lengths
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the mathematical relationships governing lens systems.

Callisto
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hi Peaple :!)

How do you determine the minimum distance p+q between the object and image for given focal length given

1/p + 1/q = 1/f

this may seem trivial, but i can't figure it out.
any tips please

Callisto
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Arent p and q distances...? Just add them.
 
If your saying given a fixed focal length, find the relationship between p and q, that case

\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = k

Solve it for either p or q (the result is the same) and graph it. I believe its a logarithmic relation, but I'm not sure.
 
What math tools do you have at your disposal?

Actually the thin lens relationship is a hyperbola.
 
I should know that, my brother did a presentation on it a week ago.
 
solving 1/p+1/p=1/f for p
i get
-qf/(f-q)
now i substitute this into p+q, then i get -q^2/(f-q).
now if i use calculus to find the minimum value i differentiate -q^2/(f-q) and let it equal zero so
d/dq= -q(2f-q)/(f-q)^2 =0 when q = 0 or 2f

Repeating this process for p then p = 0 or 2f
so the minimum distance is
p+q=4f. why is it not zero

am i completely wrong?any comments.

Callisto
 
Looks fine to me. You might want to check that 2f is a minimum (not a maximum or point of inflection), to be thorough. Looking at the lens equation itself do you see why the 0 solutions are inadmissible?
 
Last edited:
1/0+1/0=0 , 0 doesn't = 1/f
therefore 0's are excluded from the problem, correct?
Callisto
 
1/0 + 1/0 is 0? Are you sure?
 
  • #10
1/0+1/0=1/0, 1/0 doesn't = 1/f
is this why 0's are excluded?
 
  • #11
1/0 is undefined, as is 1/0+1/0, and no other arithmetic with these quantities is defined either, so if p or q were 0, you could not rearrange the equation the way that you did (without first defining a new arthmetic). In order for the lens equation to make sense with usual definitions, the assumption p, q not zero must be made.
 
  • #12
Thanks
2f must be minimum since if the object p is at infinity then 1/p=0 so q = f for an object at infinity.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
838
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K