Calculating Outward Flux of a Vector Field Across a Unit Cube Boundary

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the outward flux of vector fields across the boundaries of geometric shapes, specifically a unit cube and a solid bounded by paraboloids. The original poster attempts to calculate the flux for the vector field F = <2x, -3y, 3z> across the boundary of a unit cube, while another participant introduces a different problem involving the vector field F = <0, 0, z^2> and the divergence theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of flux across different faces of the unit cube, with some questioning the correctness of initial flux values and others suggesting the use of the divergence theorem for simplification. The second problem introduces a different vector field and explores the use of polar coordinates and the divergence theorem, raising questions about integration limits and potential errors in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the calculations for the unit cube and exploring alternative methods such as the divergence theorem. There is a recognition of potential errors in the calculations, particularly in the second problem, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus on the final outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through specific vector field setups and geometric boundaries, with some expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and assumptions regarding integration methods and limits.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Calculate the outward flux of the vector field F = <2x, -3y, 3z> across the boundary of the first-octant unit cube with opposite vertices (0, 0, 0) and (1, 1, 1).

2. The attempt at a solution

The top and the bottom of the box is easy. The flux here is 3 and 0 respectively. But how do I calculate the other sides?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I hate to be the one to break it to you but the flux over the bottom is NOT -3. The unit, outward, normal to the bottom, z= 0, is <0, 0, -1> so you are integrating [itex]<2x,-3y,2z>\cdot<0, 0, ->= <2x, -3y, 0>\cdot<0, 0, -1>= 0[/itex], since z= 0 there, over the xy-plane, 0< x< 1, 0< y, 1. That flux is 0. It is correct that the flux over the top, z= 1 is
[tex]\int_{x=0}^1\int_{y= 0}^1 <x, y, 3>\cdot<0, 0, 1> dxdy= 3[/itex].<br /> <br /> The "left" face is x= 0 and an outward unit normal is <-1, 0, 0>. On that face, x= 0 so the integrand is [itex]<0, -3y, 3z>\cdot<-1, 0, 0>= 0[/itex] so the flux there is also 0.<br /> The "right" face is x= 1 and an outward unit normal is <1, 0, 0>. On that face, x= 1 so the integrand is [itex]<2, -3y, 3z>\cdot<1, 0, 0>[/itex] integrate that for 0<y<1, 0< z< 1.<br /> <br /> The "front" face is y= 0 and an outward unit normal is <0, -1, 0>. On that face, y= 0 so the integrand is [itex]<2x, 0, 3z>\cdot<0, -1, 0>[/itex].<br /> The "back" face is y= 1 and an outward unit normal is <0, 1, 0>. On that face, y= 1 so the integrand is [itex]<2x, -3, 3z>\cdot<0, 1, 0>[/itex].<br /> <br /> Of course, it would be easy to very easy to use the divergence theorem to get the answer.[/tex]
 
Yes, the divergenze theorem is part of the next chapter, but it would definitely be easier. How about this one:

Calculate the outward flux of the vector field F = <0, 0, z^2> out of the boundary of te solid bounded by the paraboloids z= z^2 and z = 18 - z^2 - y^2

I change to polar coordinates: z = 18 - r^2 and z = r^2. These functions intersect in the circle r=3.

Then I use the divergence theorem, integrating 2z dz dr d(tetha) within the limits [r^2, 18-r^2], [0, 3] og [0, 2*pi] respectively. The answer I get is 1296*pi. The correct answer is 1458*pi. Where's my mistake?
 
The differential of volume in cylindrical coordinates is [itex]r dzdrd\theta[/itex]. You forgot the "r".
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K