Calculating Peak Current in Inductive Reactance of 0.1H @340V, 50Hz

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roomie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the peak current in a circuit with a pure inductance of 0.1H when a peak voltage of 340V is applied. The frequency of the supply is given as 50Hz, and the context includes concepts of inductive reactance and phasor representation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the inductive reactance using the formula XL = jwL and raises questions about the correctness of their approach. Some participants confirm the calculations but emphasize the need to find the peak current, prompting further exploration of the relationship between voltage and impedance.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the relationship between voltage, impedance, and current in an AC circuit. There is a focus on understanding the phasor representation of current and its amplitude, with some guidance provided on interpreting complex numbers in this context. Multiple interpretations of the results are being explored, particularly regarding the representation of phase shifts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating concepts related to imaginary numbers and phasor notation, indicating a learning curve in understanding these mathematical tools in the context of AC circuits.

Roomie
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the peak current when the voltage is applied across a pure inductance of value 0.1H?

We're told that the Peak Voltage is 340V, that the power supply is rated at 240V rms.
f=50hz

Homework Equations



XL = jwL

w=2pi*f


The Attempt at a Solution



w=2pi*50 = 100pi

XL = jwL = j*100pi*0.1 = 10pi*j

I've never done this before so I have no idea if this is correct or a stupid answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's correct so far, and it's not a stupid answer. However, you haven't finished solving the problem. The problem asks for the peak *current.*

In general, current equals voltage over impedance, right? I = V/Z.

For the case of an ideal inductor, the impedance consists entirely of reactance, right? There is no resistance. So:

Z = XL

When you carry out the division V/XL, you get the amplitude and phase of the sinusoidal current being driven across the inductor.
 
cepheid said:
It's correct so far, and it's not a stupid answer. However, you haven't finished solving the problem. The problem asks for the peak *current.*

In general, current equals voltage over impedance, right? I = V/Z.

For the case of an ideal inductor, the impedance consists entirely of reactance, right? There is no resistance. So:

Z = XL

When you carry out the division V/XL, you get the amplitude and phase of the sinusoidal current being driven across the inductor.
Thanks for your help, it's much appreciated!

So I get a final answer of 34/jpi ?
So it's an imaginary answer right? I'm relatively new to imaginary numbers too, so would this be the right way to write it? Thanks!
 
Right, the full phasor current (which contains information about the amplitude and the phase of this AC current) is:

[tex]\tilde{I} = \frac{34}{j\pi} = -j\frac{34}{\pi}[/tex]

I've just used the I with a tilde (squiggle) over it to represent the complex "phasor" current. However, the question is just asking you for the peak value of the current (in other words, its amplitude). So you don't need the -j part (which represents a phase shift of [itex]-\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] relative to the AC voltage). The trick to seeing why this is true is to rewrite this complex number in a form that makes it clearer what is its amplitude and what is its phase. Basically, -j can be rewritten as a complex exponential:

[tex]-j = e^{-j\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

If you don't understand why this is true, don't worry about it. You will learn it in due course. In any case, the current then becomes:

[tex]\tilde{I} = \frac{34}{\pi}e^{-j\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

So, the magnitude of this complex number (the factor in front of the exponential) represents the amplitude of the signal. The phase of the complex number (which is the argument of the exponential -- i.e. the thing multiplying the j in the exponent), represents the phase of the signal. At the end of the day, the complex number is just two real numbers: the amplitude and the phase, which is what makes it such a convenient and compact way to describe a sinusoid. Engineers like to write the above in "phasor notation" as:

[tex]\tilde{I} = \frac{34}{\pi} \angle -\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

I hope this helps.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K