Calculating Potential Vorticity of a Parcel of Air

AI Thread Summary
Calculating potential vorticity (PV) for air parcels involves using various meteorological parameters such as temperature, pressure, and wind speed. Potential vorticity is a crucial concept in meteorology, particularly for distinguishing between tropospheric and stratospheric air masses. The formula for PV incorporates gravity, absolute vorticity, and static stability. Understanding PV can enhance the analysis of fluid dynamics in stratified atmospheres. This approach is supported by research, including work by McIntyre (2012), which emphasizes the significance of PV in atmospheric studies.
Johnball96
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to calculate the potential vorticity (PV) in units (PVU) of thousands of different parcels of air on varying spatial and temporal scales. Variables available are as follows;

parameter Unit Format Precision Default value :

1 date yyyymmdd I8.8 0 99999999
2 time hhmmss I6.6 0 999999
3 latitude deg F6.2 0.01 -99.99
4 longitude deg F7.2 0.01 -999.99
5 baro altitude m F8.1 0.3 -99999.9
6 radio altitude m F7.1 0.1 -9999.9
7 pressure Pa I7 10 -999999
8 A340. stat. temp. deg C F6.2 0.25 -99.99
9 A340.air.speed m/s F7.2 0.01 -999.99
10 A340.ground.speed m/s F7.2 0.01 -999.99
11 wind direction deg F7.2 0.01 -999.99
12 wind speed m/s F7.2 0.01 -999.99
13 ozone mixing ratio ppbv I5 1 -9999
14 static temp. deg C F5.1 0.1 -99.9
15 Relative humidity % F6.1 0.1 -999.9
16 RH validity 0,1,2,3 I2 0 9
17 RH uncertainty % I3 1 -99
18 H2O mixing ratio g/kg F7.3 0.01 -99.999
19 CO mixing ratio ppbv F6.0 1 -9999.
20 NOy mixing ratio ppbv F6.2 0.01 -99.99
21 NO mixing ratio ppbv F6.2 0.01 -99.99
22 NOx mixing ratio ppbv F6.2 0.01 -99.99
23 NOy uncertainty ppbv F6.2 0.01 -99.99
24 NOy validity 0-63 I2 0 -9

Is it possible to calculate the potential vorticity of an individual air particle?

Thank you in advance

John
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What, please, is a potential vorticity?

The two terms are used specifically in mutually exclusive circumstances.
 
I am trying to uses potential vorticity (PV) as a meteorological tool to isolate Tropospheric airmass from those of stratospheric origin. Many papers discuss calculation of PV as a good technique for this.

McIntyre (2012) describe PV as "the constancy on a fluid particle... central to stratified, rotating fluid dynamics". I think the idea is that there is the potential for creating vorticity at different latitudes where adiabatic variance in isentropically frictionless separated layers

there is a potential for creating vorticity by changing latitude and by adiabatically
changing the separation of isentropic layers.

PV = g(-∂θ/∂p)ζ

where g is gravity, ζ is the component of absolute vorticity normal to an isentropic surface, and -∂θ/∂p is the static stability.

Does this answer your question?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top