Calculating Power for Hovering Thrust: What is the Correct Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter reebrah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hovering Thrust
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the power required for a fan to achieve a specified thrust while hovering. Participants explore the appropriate equations and factors influencing the calculation, including fan efficiency and thrust units.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation from Wikipedia for calculating power based on thrust, efficiency, and air density, but questions its validity after obtaining a seemingly high power value.
  • Another participant confirms the equation's structure but points out the incorrect use of thrust units, emphasizing that thrust should be expressed as a force rather than mass.
  • A different participant mentions an alternative equation that replaces the efficiency term with a constant of four, prompting a request for confirmation of its correctness.
  • One participant explains that the constant of four assumes no energy loss when air is accelerated, noting that this model is simplistic and neglects factors like viscosity and turbulence.
  • A participant expresses a desire to accurately model power consumption based on thrust and fan radius, inquiring about other relevant factors.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of defining fan efficiency clearly, suggesting that it can vary based on how it is applied in equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for careful consideration of units and definitions, particularly regarding thrust and fan efficiency. However, multiple competing views on the correct equation and its components remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the definitions of fan efficiency and the assumptions underlying the equations discussed, particularly in relation to energy losses and the simplifications made in the models.

reebrah
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


basically I am doing work that requires me to calculate power for given thrust of a fan which is hovering.



Homework Equations


We are given the diameter: 0.8m, thrust output of fan: 250kg, rho=1.1455 kg/m^3, and eta which is the fan efficiency = 0.8


The Attempt at a Solution



I found this equation in wikipedia:

P^2 = (T^3) / ( (eta^2)(rho)A)

using this equation I got 7322w of power to attain a thrust of 250kg...This seems a little off. What is wrong here? does anyone know if this is even the correct value or even correct equation? thank you and appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation looks fine (although, It depends on how the fan efficiency is defined).

One thing which is not right is that you've put thrust in units of kg, but thrust is a measure of force, not mass.
 
BruceW said:
Your equation looks fine (although, It depends on how the fan efficiency is defined).

One thing which is not right is that you've put thrust in units of kg, but thrust is a measure of force, not mass.

there's also another eq. I've found on wikipedia which replaces the eta^2 with a constant of four. How can i confirm this is correct? Also you are right about the thrust units.
 
The constant of 4 is assuming that no energy is lost as heat when the air is accelerated. You can derive the equation by considering the volume of air which passes through the fan in some time interval. It is the very simplest model you could imagine, since it neglects the effects of viscosity, turbulence, etc

For your homework, are you meant to be explaining why a particular equation is the correct one? Or were you just asking about the equation because you were curious?
 
No i am just trying to find an accurate way to model power consumed given an amount of thrust and radius of fan. Are their any other factors i should be worried about?
 
Your equation is fine. As I said, you just need to be careful what you use as your fan efficiency, since different people might define it differently. For example, you could keep the constant of 4 in the equation, as well as the fan efficiency, in which case, the fan efficiency would be defined differently.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K